<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Amazing How EQ And TU Differ (Re: Simulation &amp;amp; More) in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325443#M26425</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It goes without saying that EQ hates lates.&amp;nbsp; Look at the difference between my TU and EQ scores and both have the same derog info.&amp;nbsp; I lost points for 0% util on EQ and EX but not TU.&amp;nbsp; I think EX gives a better boost on lowering util to 9% though.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marty56</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-23T12:28:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Amazing How EQ And TU Differ (Re: Simulation &amp; More)</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/324755#M26395</link>
      <description>For those that do not know, it really does seem that EQ is happy to see limited 'new activity'. I have a 3 month old 'new' Orchard card and EQ lists that as 'good' under new credit. Whereas PU (I had to) considers it BAD to have no real new accounts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Second, I've also noticed JUST how critical it is to not have $0 balances across the board. When I tested with TU and EQ, I owe $337 according to them in order to clear my CC balance. When I enter a simulation of paying 100%, the simulation min and max are at least 10 points lower than if I leave $10+ dollars remaining.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I will wait for mid sept when both of my balances show 5% but over $0 and see if the simulation works. Also, when I enter $2500 as the value for the 'new credit' simulation, EQ doesn't show the spike that TU does.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, if you wish to boost EQ, it SEEMS to be that new accounts can be more detrimental than it is with TU. Have any of you noticed this?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'll keep you informed with how things work, if you are interested in seeing trends over time.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/324755#M26395</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-22T15:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amazing How EQ And TU Differ (Re: Simulation &amp; More)</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325350#M26412</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;I've noticed that too. I had opened 7 CCs one after another and saw a 50-75 point hit. TU, while damaged, seemed more immune than the others. EX seemed to take it the worse.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325350#M26412</guid>
      <dc:creator>llecs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-23T03:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amazing How EQ And TU Differ (Re: Simulation &amp; More)</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325443#M26425</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It goes without saying that EQ hates lates.&amp;nbsp; Look at the difference between my TU and EQ scores and both have the same derog info.&amp;nbsp; I lost points for 0% util on EQ and EX but not TU.&amp;nbsp; I think EX gives a better boost on lowering util to 9% though.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325443#M26425</guid>
      <dc:creator>marty56</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-23T12:28:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amazing How EQ And TU Differ (Re: Simulation &amp; More)</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325461#M26427</link>
      <description>Interesting. I'm waiting to clear a few baddies (mostly by November) and it'll allow me a better chance to gauge the true difference between EX/TU (EQ won't have the $2500 CJ account) so it'll be interesting to see if TU catches up to EX shortly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Speaking of which, I hope the CJ account actually boosts the score :/</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Amazing-How-EQ-And-TU-Differ-Re-Simulation-amp-More/m-p/325461#M26427</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-23T13:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

