<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Creit History length differences in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Creit-History-length-differences/m-p/925358#M54851</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have Score Watch and Quarterly monitoring and this week I received the new TU report and pulled EQ report as well and my credit history list my oldest account at 11 yrs 1month with average age at 7 yrs but for TU such history is an "helping factor"&amp;nbsp; yet&amp;nbsp; for EQ is an "Hurting one" (EQ list credit history same as TU 11 yrs and 1 month and 7 yrs average). How is it possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover, even EQ listed my credit history lenght as "helping my score" 3 months ago but now despite no changes it is a negative factor....is this an error?? if yes how can I get it fix??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any help is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 02:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-21T02:24:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creit History length differences</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Creit-History-length-differences/m-p/925358#M54851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have Score Watch and Quarterly monitoring and this week I received the new TU report and pulled EQ report as well and my credit history list my oldest account at 11 yrs 1month with average age at 7 yrs but for TU such history is an "helping factor"&amp;nbsp; yet&amp;nbsp; for EQ is an "Hurting one" (EQ list credit history same as TU 11 yrs and 1 month and 7 yrs average). How is it possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover, even EQ listed my credit history lenght as "helping my score" 3 months ago but now despite no changes it is a negative factor....is this an error?? if yes how can I get it fix??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any help is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 02:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Creit-History-length-differences/m-p/925358#M54851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-21T02:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creit History length differences</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Creit-History-length-differences/m-p/926062#M54861</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can you share your TU and EQ FICO scores with us? This might help us figure out why EQ is being strange.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 03:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Creit-History-length-differences/m-p/926062#M54861</guid>
      <dc:creator>fused</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-22T03:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

