<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Statu?? in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55619#M8751</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It's a neutral/positive status. A very common way, albeit slightly odd in phrasing, that TU codes some of its old positive tradelines is what produces that particular status line.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;An underwriter seeing that comment won't assume that a BK was involved. Without evidence of an actual BK, the underwriter will know the tradeline is unrated. Nothing negative is being reported about it. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 04:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tuscani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-26T04:45:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Statu??</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/54838#M8681</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Under my TU report I show a mortgage completely paid off in 2006. Under status is says&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;unrated or bankruptcy. I'v never filed bankruptcy, so what does the unrated mean??&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/54838#M8681</guid>
      <dc:creator>hpertrain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-24T12:36:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statu??</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55437#M8730</link>
      <description>Does anyone know the answer to this? I too would like to know the answer to this. thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55437#M8730</guid>
      <dc:creator>oracles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-25T18:32:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statu??</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55580#M8747</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Well I hope someone knows because its showing on mine too..Never bankrupt.....I think there should be a law against it for just being there....&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55580#M8747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-26T01:33:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Statu??</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55619#M8751</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;It's a neutral/positive status. A very common way, albeit slightly odd in phrasing, that TU codes some of its old positive tradelines is what produces that particular status line.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;An underwriter seeing that comment won't assume that a BK was involved. Without evidence of an actual BK, the underwriter will know the tradeline is unrated. Nothing negative is being reported about it. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 04:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Statu/m-p/55619#M8751</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tuscani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-26T04:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

