<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241775#M99517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if those utilization numbers are meant to be 1/1000ths of your limit, rather than dollar values. That would make sense then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that case the score increments are 10%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more of your limit. I can't imagine a scoring model where those would be dollars -- a $1000 balance may be small for one person, and way over the limit for another. But if those average balance numbers are 1/1000th's &amp;nbsp;it makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-20T18:36:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241412#M99490</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I found this Fico Score Model Chart.I found it very educational.I'm sure the points are not 100% accurate,but it will&amp;nbsp;defiantly assist in my Credit Rebuilding.If anyone has any other charts,graphs or&amp;nbsp;any Foco educational info. Please post it up?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the link;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://www.doughroller.net/credit/a-rare-glimpse-inside-the-fico-credit-score-formula/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.doughroller.net/credit/a-rare-glimpse-inside-the-fico-credit-score-formula/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;DIYcredit&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 06:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241412#M99490</guid>
      <dc:creator>DIYcredit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T06:38:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241481#M99491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That chart predicts my score will jump 25 points in the next month when I go from having 2 inquiries under 6 months to zero (but still the same number under one year).&lt;IMG src="http://doughroller.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FICO-Scoring-Model-e1335744261617.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My score is currently 733, that predicts a jump up to the neighborhood of 758.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will see in the next six weeks if it is true &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:53:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241481#M99491</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T11:53:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241721#M99514</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart predicts my score will jump 25 points in the next month when I go from having 2 inquiries under 6 months to zero (but still the same number under one year).&lt;IMG src="http://doughroller.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FICO-Scoring-Model-e1335744261617.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My score is currently 733, that predicts a jump up to the neighborhood of 758.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will see in the next six weeks if it is true &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This chart sucks big time. &amp;nbsp;There is no way that one would lose 50 points for having 4 inquiries in six months. &amp;nbsp;That's 12.5 points per inquiry. &amp;nbsp;Also, it gives the second highest possible score for having a zero average balance across all cards. &amp;nbsp;That would require all cards reporting a zero, and that is not good for FICO. &amp;nbsp; And FICO doesn't care about absolute balance amounts (like dinging you most for a balance at 1K plus versus under $100. &amp;nbsp;All that matters is percent utilization of all cards totaled, the number of cards with a balance, and whether any one card is at 90% or more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whoever made that chart does not understand FICO scoring. &amp;nbsp;I have no doubt it was not published my FICO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:30:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241721#M99514</guid>
      <dc:creator>CH-7-Mission-Accomplished</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T17:30:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241726#M99516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This chart is more than 3 years old. It may have some value, but it is just an internal training model. I wouldn't base any decision on it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241726#M99516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T17:43:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241775#M99517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if those utilization numbers are meant to be 1/1000ths of your limit, rather than dollar values. That would make sense then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that case the score increments are 10%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more of your limit. I can't imagine a scoring model where those would be dollars -- a $1000 balance may be small for one person, and way over the limit for another. But if those average balance numbers are 1/1000th's &amp;nbsp;it makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241775#M99517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T18:36:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241779#M99518</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if those utilization numbers are meant to be 1/1000ths of your limit, rather than dollar values. That would make sense then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that case the score increments are 10%, 50%, 75% and 100% or more of your limit. I can't imagine a scoring model where those would be dollars -- a $1000 balance may be small for one person, and way over the limit for another. But if those average balance numbers are 1/1000th's &amp;nbsp;it makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whoever looks at this chart, please&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;do not&lt;/STRONG&gt; think it was put out by the FICO company. &amp;nbsp;It was put together by some individual. &amp;nbsp;FICO would never be this specific, for one thing, and the data incorrect for a second.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FICO requires that anytime you use their trademarked FICO logo, you must be put in a footnote that gives them full attribution. &amp;nbsp;Seeing that footnote and the name FICO in the header of the graphic should not make anyone believe it came from FICO or has anything to do with them. &amp;nbsp;It is simply acknowledging that their name is trademarked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also we all know about scorecards and we are constantly being reminded that "inquiries don't matter." &amp;nbsp;If four inquiries would nail you for 50 points, there would be a world of hurt around here. &amp;nbsp;Plus you cannot generalize how something like number of inquiries will affect scores across all profiles since all the data is weighted differently based on score cards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just don't want anybody thinking this graphic has any type of FICO involvement because it doesn't. &amp;nbsp;It is one person's attempt to educate people using patently false information. The graphic should be destroyed!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241779#M99518</guid>
      <dc:creator>CH-7-Mission-Accomplished</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T18:49:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241783#M99519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The chart is an illustrative example of how Fico works. And yes, this chart has been around a long time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't view the&amp;nbsp;specific numbers&amp;nbsp;as a real world accurate depiction of score impact associated with factors. Rather, look at it as an educational tool&amp;nbsp;that indicates&amp;nbsp;how factors influence score and general magnitude of impact. Note: I suspect this is a 3rd party chart (not directly from Fico).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241783#M99519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Thumb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T18:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241788#M99520</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/813318"&gt;@CH-7-Mission-Accomplished&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart predicts my score will jump 25 points in the next month when I go from having 2 inquiries under 6 months to zero (but still the same number under one year).&lt;IMG src="http://doughroller.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FICO-Scoring-Model-e1335744261617.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My score is currently 733, that predicts a jump up to the neighborhood of 758.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will see in the next six weeks if it is true &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This chart sucks big time. &amp;nbsp;There is no way that one would lose 50 points for having 4 inquiries in six months. &amp;nbsp;That's 12.5 points per inquiry. &amp;nbsp;Also, it gives the second highest possible score for having a zero average balance across all cards. &amp;nbsp;That would require all cards reporting a zero, and that is not good for FICO. &amp;nbsp; And FICO doesn't care about absolute balance amounts (like dinging you most for a balance at 1K plus versus under $100. &amp;nbsp;All that matters is percent utilization of all cards totaled, the number of cards with a balance, and whether any one card is at 90% or more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whoever made that chart does not understand FICO scoring. &amp;nbsp;I have no doubt it was not published my FICO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart is from a FICO World 2010 presentation by a FICO Principal Consultant for Scores and Analytics (J.W.)...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it's an &lt;STRONG&gt;example&lt;/STRONG&gt;, not an actual copy of the scoring criteria in any particular model. &amp;nbsp;For that matter, a 2014 version of that slide changed the title from "Example FICO Scoring Model" to "Example FICO Score &lt;STRONG&gt;Reason&lt;/STRONG&gt; Computation", and clarifies that the points listed are NOT part of the 850 scale, but rather part of the method for determining the four reason codes/score factors. &amp;nbsp;(Reason code "selection and order based upon difference from maximum points" in each reason code category.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that these presentations are available to FICO World/FICO Boot Camp attendees, and are marked "&lt;EM&gt;FICO Confidential - This presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Fair Isaac Corporation's express consent.&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241788#M99520</guid>
      <dc:creator>iv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T18:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241830#M99521</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/446112"&gt;@iv&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/813318"&gt;@CH-7-Mission-Accomplished&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart predicts my score will jump 25 points in the next month when I go from having 2 inquiries under 6 months to zero (but still the same number under one year).&lt;IMG src="http://doughroller.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FICO-Scoring-Model-e1335744261617.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My score is currently 733, that predicts a jump up to the neighborhood of 758.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will see in the next six weeks if it is true &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This chart sucks big time. &amp;nbsp;There is no way that one would lose 50 points for having 4 inquiries in six months. &amp;nbsp;That's 12.5 points per inquiry. &amp;nbsp;Also, it gives the second highest possible score for having a zero average balance across all cards. &amp;nbsp;That would require all cards reporting a zero, and that is not good for FICO. &amp;nbsp; And FICO doesn't care about absolute balance amounts (like dinging you most for a balance at 1K plus versus under $100. &amp;nbsp;All that matters is percent utilization of all cards totaled, the number of cards with a balance, and whether any one card is at 90% or more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whoever made that chart does not understand FICO scoring. &amp;nbsp;I have no doubt it was not published my FICO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart is from a FICO World 2010 presentation by a FICO Principal Consultant for Scores and Analytics (J.W.)...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it's an &lt;STRONG&gt;example&lt;/STRONG&gt;, not an actual copy of the scoring criteria in any particular model. &amp;nbsp;For that matter, a 2014 version of that slide changed the title from "Example FICO Scoring Model" to "Example FICO Score &lt;STRONG&gt;Reason&lt;/STRONG&gt; Computation", and clarifies that the points listed are NOT part of the 850 scale, but rather part of the method for determining the four reason codes/score factors. &amp;nbsp;(Reason code "selection and order based upon difference from maximum points" in each reason code category.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that these presentations are available to FICO World/FICO Boot Camp attendees, and are marked "&lt;EM&gt;FICO Confidential - T&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;his presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Fair Isaac Corporation's express consent.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Oh, boy, now you've done it!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4241830#M99521</guid>
      <dc:creator>CH-7-Mission-Accomplished</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-20T20:16:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4242460#M99535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That chart is laughably bad when it comes to any FICO algorithm... heck parts of it are more applicable to Vantage Score which is the truly LOL part of it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4242460#M99535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Revelate</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-21T07:44:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4242461#M99536</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/446112"&gt;@iv&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/813318"&gt;@CH-7-Mission-Accomplished&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart predicts my score will jump 25 points in the next month when I go from having 2 inquiries under 6 months to zero (but still the same number under one year).&lt;IMG src="http://doughroller.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FICO-Scoring-Model-e1335744261617.png" border="0" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My score is currently 733, that predicts a jump up to the neighborhood of 758.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We will see in the next six weeks if it is true &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This chart sucks big time. &amp;nbsp;There is no way that one would lose 50 points for having 4 inquiries in six months. &amp;nbsp;That's 12.5 points per inquiry. &amp;nbsp;Also, it gives the second highest possible score for having a zero average balance across all cards. &amp;nbsp;That would require all cards reporting a zero, and that is not good for FICO. &amp;nbsp; And FICO doesn't care about absolute balance amounts (like dinging you most for a balance at 1K plus versus under $100. &amp;nbsp;All that matters is percent utilization of all cards totaled, the number of cards with a balance, and whether any one card is at 90% or more.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whoever made that chart does not understand FICO scoring. &amp;nbsp;I have no doubt it was not published my FICO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart is from a FICO World 2010 presentation by a FICO Principal Consultant for Scores and Analytics (J.W.)...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it's an &lt;STRONG&gt;example&lt;/STRONG&gt;, not an actual copy of the scoring criteria in any particular model. &amp;nbsp;For that matter, a 2014 version of that slide changed the title from "Example FICO Scoring Model" to "Example FICO Score &lt;STRONG&gt;Reason&lt;/STRONG&gt; Computation", and clarifies that the points listed are NOT part of the 850 scale, but rather part of the method for determining the four reason codes/score factors. &amp;nbsp;(Reason code "selection and order based upon difference from maximum points" in each reason code category.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF00FF"&gt;Note that these presentations are available to FICO World/FICO Boot Camp attendees, and are marked "&lt;EM&gt;FICO Confidential - This presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Fair Isaac Corporation's express consent.&lt;/EM&gt;"&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;They're published by FICO on the Intarwebs in at least 2 or 3 different locations. &amp;nbsp;Think it's pretty much public domain now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 07:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4242461#M99536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Revelate</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-21T07:47:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4243589#M99568</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/534281"&gt;@Revelate&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart is laughably bad when it comes to any FICO algorithm... heck parts of it are more applicable to Vantage Score which is the truly LOL part of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;...that's because it's NOT about the FICO &lt;STRONG&gt;scoring&lt;/STRONG&gt; algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;It's about reason code generation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;I think you'll actually be fairly interested in the newer version of that slide deck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/534281"&gt;@Revelate&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;They're published by FICO on the Intarwebs in at least 2 or 3 different locations. &amp;nbsp;Think it's pretty much public domain now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's not exactly how public domain works, and you know it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But yes, they are readily available, including on fico.com, with the right search terms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:06:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4243589#M99568</guid>
      <dc:creator>iv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-22T01:06:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AWSOME FICO SCORE FORMULA CHART</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4243738#M99577</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/446112"&gt;@iv&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/534281"&gt;@Revelate&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;That chart is laughably bad when it comes to any FICO algorithm... heck parts of it are more applicable to Vantage Score which is the truly LOL part of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;...that's because it's NOT about the FICO &lt;STRONG&gt;scoring&lt;/STRONG&gt; algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;It's about reason code generation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;I think you'll actually be fairly interested in the newer version of that slide deck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/534281"&gt;@Revelate&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;They're published by FICO on the Intarwebs in at least 2 or 3 different locations. &amp;nbsp;Think it's pretty much public domain now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF00FF"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's not exactly how public domain works, and you know it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But yes, they are readily available, including on fico.com, with the right search terms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are correct, I misused the term. &amp;nbsp;My point was I stumbled across them about a year or more ago unsecured on their website, and to my knowledge other people distributed them elsewhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My point was much like other information, it's so far distributed there's no hope of recalling it ergo "public domain"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should've used different terminology, mea culpa.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 02:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/AWSOME-FICO-SCORE-FORMULA-CHART/m-p/4243738#M99577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Revelate</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-22T02:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

