<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kia Financial Dispute in General Credit Topics</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/484780#M127952</link>
    <description>I would talk to them first before mailing. It is good to know what the other is thinking. This gives you a chance to tweak your argument based on what they say. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;30 or 60 days late really don't impact your score beyond 2 yrs. However, having them removed will make your CR look better and improve your chances for a higher score with other scoring systems like the auto-enhanced FICO score that some lenders use or the "FICO08" models that tend to look at past trends a little more than they do now.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>llecs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-18T12:13:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kia Financial Dispute</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/484683#M127947</link>
      <description>I am in the process of disputing late payments with Kia Financial...I haven't mailed the letter yet because I was waiting on bank statements to prove that I wasn't late.&amp;nbsp; The argument is that the day the payment posted to my bank account was maybe 1 to 2 days after the grace period.&amp;nbsp; I know that when an ACH payment is done over the phone, it will take at least 2 days for it post to the bank account, but it will post to the car accout that same day.&amp;nbsp;I called in to get a mailing address for disputes and the Customer Service Rep offered to go over the info w/me before I send the letter in.&amp;nbsp; Is that wise to do or should I just send the info in to the dispute dept. to let them handle it.&amp;nbsp; Oh yeah, the lates date back to 2004 and 2005...is it even worth it?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/484683#M127947</guid>
      <dc:creator>DST</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-18T03:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kia Financial Dispute</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/484780#M127952</link>
      <description>I would talk to them first before mailing. It is good to know what the other is thinking. This gives you a chance to tweak your argument based on what they say. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;30 or 60 days late really don't impact your score beyond 2 yrs. However, having them removed will make your CR look better and improve your chances for a higher score with other scoring systems like the auto-enhanced FICO score that some lenders use or the "FICO08" models that tend to look at past trends a little more than they do now.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/484780#M127952</guid>
      <dc:creator>llecs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-18T12:13:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kia Financial Dispute</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/485002#M127966</link>
      <description>Thanks...</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/Kia-Financial-Dispute/m-p/485002#M127966</guid>
      <dc:creator>DST</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-18T18:56:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

