<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EQ vs TU/EX in General Credit Topics</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6436987#M317722</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It really seems like a poorly kept secret that EQ is the weaker performer among the three national bureaus. I mean, the fact that file splitting can even happen is wild to me, but it seems EQ's infrastructure is weakest. I'm not sure about everyone &amp;nbsp;else, but EQ's omissions on my report are so favorable to me that they're almost criminal. I wonder- why does anyone (lenders) still count them as reliable? If I were in charge of lending and consumer credit, an EQ report would be the last thing I'd trust.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do others think/what's your experience been?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Xyta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-05T22:52:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EQ vs TU/EX</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6436987#M317722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It really seems like a poorly kept secret that EQ is the weaker performer among the three national bureaus. I mean, the fact that file splitting can even happen is wild to me, but it seems EQ's infrastructure is weakest. I'm not sure about everyone &amp;nbsp;else, but EQ's omissions on my report are so favorable to me that they're almost criminal. I wonder- why does anyone (lenders) still count them as reliable? If I were in charge of lending and consumer credit, an EQ report would be the last thing I'd trust.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do others think/what's your experience been?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2021 22:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6436987#M317722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xyta</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-05T22:52:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EQ vs TU/EX</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6439266#M317723</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi OP and Welcome to MyFICO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know the answer but wanted to respond to bump your post up to the top.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:48:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6439266#M317723</guid>
      <dc:creator>CreditInspired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-10T12:48:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EQ vs TU/EX</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6440635#M317729</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1125318"&gt;@Xyta&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;It really seems like a poorly kept secret that EQ is the weaker performer among the three national bureaus. I mean, the fact that file splitting can even happen is wild to me, but it seems EQ's infrastructure is weakest. I'm not sure about everyone &amp;nbsp;else, but EQ's omissions on my report are so favorable to me that they're almost criminal. I wonder- why does anyone (lenders) still count them as reliable? If I were in charge of lending and consumer credit, an EQ report would be the last thing I'd trust.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do others think/what's your experience been?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I have been wondering that, too. For me, Equifax updates last, so the score is always the lowest.&amp;nbsp; I have never heard of file splitting, what is that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6440635#M317729</guid>
      <dc:creator>shalimarcat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-12T15:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EQ vs TU/EX</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6442397#M317774</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1125318"&gt;@Xyta&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;It really seems like a poorly kept secret that EQ is the weaker performer among the three national bureaus. I mean, the fact that file splitting can even happen is wild to me, but it seems EQ's infrastructure is weakest. I'm not sure about everyone &amp;nbsp;else, but EQ's omissions on my report are so favorable to me that they're almost criminal. I wonder- why does anyone (lenders) still count them as reliable? If I were in charge of lending and consumer credit, an EQ report would be the last thing I'd trust.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do others think/what's your experience been?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am stunned that EQ is generally far more utilized than TU.&amp;nbsp; As you mentioned, I have little trust in EQ and watch them very closely.&amp;nbsp; I have also found that TU's CSRs are far superior to EQ.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 03:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/General-Credit-Topics/EQ-vs-TU-EX/m-p/6442397#M317774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phana24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-16T03:04:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

