<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Collections vs Negative Accounts in Rebuilding Your Credit</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Collections-vs-Negative-Accounts/m-p/4576083#M485615</link>
    <description>Are collections worse, score impact wise, than negative accounts ? I have a paid collection from Pinnacle(Verizon bill) showing up under my negative accounts, in comments it says collection account. Does that mean that entry is improperly categorized ? Or does that really not make a difference ?</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 03:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-03T03:54:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Collections vs Negative Accounts</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Collections-vs-Negative-Accounts/m-p/4576083#M485615</link>
      <description>Are collections worse, score impact wise, than negative accounts ? I have a paid collection from Pinnacle(Verizon bill) showing up under my negative accounts, in comments it says collection account. Does that mean that entry is improperly categorized ? Or does that really not make a difference ?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 03:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Collections-vs-Negative-Accounts/m-p/4576083#M485615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-03T03:54:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Collections vs Negative Accounts</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Collections-vs-Negative-Accounts/m-p/4576219#M485622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A "negative account" is an overall descriptor that simply means the account is currently not in good-standing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The term does not identify the level of delinquency, and thus it could vary from a minor 30-late up to a 180+ late or charge-off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charge-offs are as bad as it gets under reporting by the OC, and collections reported by debt collectors are additional and generally at the equiv score impact to a charge-off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your credit report can include a reference by the OC to their referral for collection, but an actual "collection" for scoring purposes is whent the debt collector actually reports their collection to the CRA.&amp;nbsp; Debt collector reporting is stored in an entirely different segment of the consumer credit file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Commerical credit reports sometimes blur that distinction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you post a screen shot of the portion of the credit report at issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 08:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Collections-vs-Negative-Accounts/m-p/4576219#M485622</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertEG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-03T08:05:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

