Yep, month of filing late/co notations are ok, but they should be the last. No if you reaffirmed any of these accounts and were late, they can report that. But I recall you did't reaffirm your mortgage so that late shouldn't be there. The CO after filing are counting against you, so definitely work on getting the post bk ones off your reports. Good luck. And if you're disputing online, make sure you print out your results when you get them. You want to keep a paper trail of everything when dealing with credit repair. Good luck!
Definitely not the best, just been there myself and did the same thing you did. Found salvation within these forums. But thanks for the compliment.
LindaLu and misti -
For any accounts that came/come back verified then write the OC. Notify them that they are incorrectly reporting lates and co's after the date you filed for bk and politely request them to remove the lates and co's that are incorrectly reporting. Like:
Dear OC -
I filed for Ch ___ BK on such and such date. According to my cr(s) from EX, EQ, TU, OC name has continued to report late payments/co's after the date the BK was filed in violation of the stay order. OC is prohibited from reporting lates/co's after the date of filing. I'm sure this is just an oversight on OC's part. Please immediately update the account to accurately reflect that no late payments/co's occurred after the date of filing.
Attach a copy of your notice of filing that shows what chapter you filed and the date of filing. I would also send a copy of how the account is reporting (not the whole report, just the page the account appears on with all other info redacted). I had an OC say that what I was claiming they were reporting was not what they had in their file. I sent a snapshot of how the account was reporting and a week later it was corrected. I would also send this at least by certified mail so you can track it, I personally would do CMRRR. The OC's may have just verified with the CRA's that yes, it was included in BK and didn't address the inaccurate lates or co's. Keep at it.
Thank you Linda and kjm 
Do you think I should leave the ones alone that now say May 06 instead of September 06? Those may help me. What do you think I should do for those?
Do you think I should leave the ones alone that now say May 06 instead of September 06? Those may help me. What do you think I should do for those?
In my opinion, if they are still reporting lates or collections that shouldn't be there I'd make them remove them. It did make them appear older and thus has a little less impact on your score, but removing it altogether would be even better. Also, jsut because the account is showing the BK was in May versus Sep, that doesn't mean the account will necessarily fall off any sooner. The date of first delinquency determines the fall off date. I imagine you had lates prior to your bk on some of these accounts, so your dofd would be prior to your bk anyway. The date you filed bk doesn't affect the fall off date of an account unless the account was current and then you filed, then the date of filing bk is the dofd.
Awesome!!! Thank you so much kjm!!! I will contact the OC's on this