cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Ambiguous Amex Email

tag
FinStar
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@SouthJamaica wrote:

@FinStar wrote:

@SouthJamaica wrote:

@K-in-Boston wrote:

The statement is simply that if there is not a payment made to bring the current balance down, charging privileges may be interrupted.  To avoid a possible interruption for future charges, they just need the balance brought down.  This would not be any different than having a message from another lender who has issued you a revolving credit card stating that you have reached your credit limit and will not be able to make additional charges until you have available credit again.  Nowhere has a promise of increased spending ability been made as a result of payment, and there is no dishonesty there.

 

Just because someone chooses not to reply to every Amex thread with "NPSL bad.  Amex bad." doesn't make one an "Amex defender."  Stating facts based on the cardholder agreements, prior experiences, and shared knowledge helps everyone to better understand credit products and make informed lending decisions.


I didn't say there was a promise of increased spending ability. I was addressing the actual statement Amex made : "...it is important that you make a payment on your account soon to continue to enjoy uninterrupted use of your Card."  Which is simply not so. Because even if the OP paid the account down to zero instantly, he or she would not be assured of the ability to "enjoy uninterrupted use".  Amex will interrupt one's use of the NPSL cards whenever if feels like it, in accordance with its secret, shifting, internal formulae.

 


That's actually a very inaccurate statement since you're generalizing your past experience with everyone. Unless you work directly for AENB and/or are part of a group that develops the algorithms or the AI dynamic technology, it just screams sour grapes from the 'incident' you experienced that led you to cancel your Gold Card. Charge Cards (or some lenders for that matter) are not for everyone and not every product will be a good fit for all.

There are millions of charge cards (any flavor) in use worldwide, and I bet, the great majority have encountered no issues that the OP experienced (not in the past 25 years IME). I enjoy having the flexibility of using charge cards the way they're intended and I've encountered no interruptions. This even goes for similar processing and payment methodologies used by Diners Club/Carte Blanche charge cards when they were in active circulation.


Yes and you say that every single time someone posts on this forum that they have encountered the exact same issue.


At least there is consistency in balanced responses since there aren't 100s upon 100s of threads/posts (here or elsewhere) that report similar experiences. Other members have already provided their feedback upthread on similar instances. 

 

As has been mentioned upthread and in other topics, if the way a CC and/or lender operates causes more headaches than what it's worth, folks have options - plenty of them. No one is forced to receive reminders such as those AmEx generates based on the experience the OP has shared if they don't want to deal with AmEx. Similarly, no one is forcing an individual to use AmEx charge cards if the way they're designed to operate becomes more of an annoyance factor than what was initially expected. We all have choices at the end of the day. AmEx isn't going to radically change their NPSL methodology so there's that. Some folks like charge cards, others do not, and that's perfectly fine. The world still spins. 

Message 21 of 38
SouthJamaica
Mega Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@FinStar wrote:

@SouthJamaica wrote:

@FinStar wrote:

@SouthJamaica wrote:

@K-in-Boston wrote:

The statement is simply that if there is not a payment made to bring the current balance down, charging privileges may be interrupted.  To avoid a possible interruption for future charges, they just need the balance brought down.  This would not be any different than having a message from another lender who has issued you a revolving credit card stating that you have reached your credit limit and will not be able to make additional charges until you have available credit again.  Nowhere has a promise of increased spending ability been made as a result of payment, and there is no dishonesty there.

 

Just because someone chooses not to reply to every Amex thread with "NPSL bad.  Amex bad." doesn't make one an "Amex defender."  Stating facts based on the cardholder agreements, prior experiences, and shared knowledge helps everyone to better understand credit products and make informed lending decisions.


I didn't say there was a promise of increased spending ability. I was addressing the actual statement Amex made : "...it is important that you make a payment on your account soon to continue to enjoy uninterrupted use of your Card."  Which is simply not so. Because even if the OP paid the account down to zero instantly, he or she would not be assured of the ability to "enjoy uninterrupted use".  Amex will interrupt one's use of the NPSL cards whenever if feels like it, in accordance with its secret, shifting, internal formulae.

 


That's actually a very inaccurate statement since you're generalizing your past experience with everyone. Unless you work directly for AENB and/or are part of a group that develops the algorithms or the AI dynamic technology, it just screams sour grapes from the 'incident' you experienced that led you to cancel your Gold Card. Charge Cards (or some lenders for that matter) are not for everyone and not every product will be a good fit for all.

There are millions of charge cards (any flavor) in use worldwide, and I bet, the great majority have encountered no issues that the OP experienced (not in the past 25 years IME). I enjoy having the flexibility of using charge cards the way they're intended and I've encountered no interruptions. This even goes for similar processing and payment methodologies used by Diners Club/Carte Blanche charge cards when they were in active circulation.


Yes and you say that every single time someone posts on this forum that they have encountered the exact same issue.


At least there is consistency in balanced responses since there aren't 100s upon 100s of threads/posts (here or elsewhere) that report similar experiences. Other members have already provided their feedback upthread on similar instances. 

 

As has been mentioned upthread and in other topics, if the way a CC and/or lender operates causes more headaches than what it's worth, folks have options - plenty of them. No one is forced to receive reminders such as those AmEx generates based on the experience the OP has shared if they don't want to deal with AmEx. Similarly, no one is forcing an individual to use AmEx charge cards if the way they're designed to operate becomes more of an annoyance factor than what was initially expected. We all have choices at the end of the day. AmEx isn't going to radically change their NPSL methodology so there's that. Some folks like charge cards, others do not, and that's perfectly fine. The world still spins. 


Agreed.

 

And the world still spins, indeed it spins even a little more smoothly, if customers can air their grievances openly without being branded as "outliers".  And if forum members can learn about the downside of a product before, rather than after, they've signed on for it.


Total revolving limits 568220 (504020 reporting) FICO 8: EQ 689 TU 691 EX 682




Message 22 of 38
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@SouthJamaica wrote:


Agreed.

 

And the world still spins, indeed it spins even a little more smoothly, if customers can air their grievances openly without being branded as "outliers".  And if forum members can learn about the downside of a product before, rather than after, they've signed on for it.


Right, but for people to be able to make such informed decisions, it's useful to know how frequently such downsides occur.   For example, the ONLY time I have had a credit card declined (for a $30 charge at that) was an Amex.    So I am certainly free to post any or all of:

 

1) Amex credit cards?  Good luck getting ANY purchase approved with them!

2) Don't use an Amex credit card at a supermarket, it will be declined!

3) Don't use an Amex Blue Cash at a supermarket, it will be declined!

4) Don't use an Amex Blue Cash at Wholefoods in Cary, NC, it will be declined!

vs the more accurate

5) Using a new Amex credit card out of state may cause a decline

 

I think your post suggested it was much more likely than it is.

Message 23 of 38
wasCB14
Super Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email

I can kind of understand SJ's frustration.

 

I recently called Amex to try to get an answer to a question about how NPSL worked (https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Amex-Check-Spending-Matching-requests-and-transactions...), and the answer I got (from a Bus Plat CSR) was different than what a former Amex employee (Platinum/Centurion CSR) had previously said here. So I wasn't thrilled about getting inconsistent information.

 

But the fact remains that Amex will allow me to spend far more in a single transaction than other lenders will. And I've *never* (edit: missed an important word!) had my use of a card interrupted.

Personal spend: Amex Gold, Amex Schwab Plat., BofA PR+CCR(x2), Costco
Business use: Amex Bus. Plat., BBP, Lowes Amex AU, CFU AU
Perks: Delta Plat., United Explorer, IHG49, Hyatt, "Old SPG"
Mostly SD: Freedom Flex, Freedom, Arrival
Upgrade/Downgrade games: ED, BCE
SUB chasing: AA Platinum Select
Message 24 of 38
KK44
Valued Member

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email

This happened to a new Plat. After about $9K charges in the first month recevied the same email but it did specify a dollar amount to pay mid-cycle and after that was immediately paid never received a similar email since.

Message 25 of 38
SoCalGardener
Valued Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@Credit12Fico wrote:

@K-in-Boston wrote:

I wouldn't say that's ambiguous,


"However, it is important that you make a payment on your account soon to continue to enjoy uninterrupted use of your Card."

 

That's fairly ambiguous to me. They could have put a dollar amount of remaining spend before they "interrupt" my use of the card. 


AND they could've said WHEN "soon" is! Is "soon" tomorrow? Or is "soon" this month? This year?

 

I agree, it is ambiguous. I understand its point, but it is poorly worded and lacking information.

Amazon Prime Store CardAmerican Express Blue Cash Preferred CardAmerican Express Everyday CardBank of America Customized Cash VisaCapitalOne Quicksilver MastercardCapitalOne Quicksilver VisaCapitalOne Walmart Rewards MastercardChevron Texaco CardCiti Double Cash MastercardDiscover More CardJCPenney Gold MastercardOverstock.com CardSportsmans Guide Rewards VisaSynchrony Home Card
Message 26 of 38
tacpoly
Established Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@Anonymous wrote:

I have received this message from Amex before. It just means you are close to your internal soft limit. Generally Amex will average out your last three months of spending and you will have a soft internal limit based on that average. If you get close to it, they will start sending you these messages. It just means your future transactions may be declined, if you don't make a payment soon.


Would this just be for new(ish) accounts?  I've charged $30k, $19K, and $4k in the space of a few days, after only a few thousand dollars of charges over the previous 6-12 months and no peep from Amex. 

Message 27 of 38
K-in-Boston
Epic Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email

That three month rolling average gets repeated so often around here, I'm wondering if it somehow made it into the CSR script?  If so, it's definitely not the whole picture as so many of us have very different experiences.  While not a button to play with, there's too many instances of hitting the Check Spending Ability button and getting back like $100k approved when charges have been nowhere in that neighborhood (or even time zone).  I type this one so much, I will just quote myself:

 

While CSRs will generally give the blanket answer that your charging ability is based on your spending and payment history with Amex, it's only one factor in Amex's very sophisticated algorithm that determines it, and they are transparent about this in your cardmember agreement and the terms when applying for a charge card: "No pre-set spending limit on purchases does not mean unlimited spending. Your purchases are approved based on a variety of factors, including current spending patterns, your payment history, credit record, and financial resources known to us."

 

Any statements that their formulas are simply based on an average of X spending in the past Y months have been dispelled again and again.  I've gone a long time without using my Platinum card (or very minimally) in the past and then didn't think twice about plopping down a $5-15k charge on it.  I have an AU charge card for work that might see $1000 a month spending for a year or more and then I don't think twice when I need to make a $75k equipment purchase.  Those are approved based upon all of the other factors known to Amex, not previous spending on the card.

Message 28 of 38
SouthJamaica
Mega Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email


@K-in-Boston wrote:

That three month rolling average gets repeated so often around here, I'm wondering if it somehow made it into the CSR script?  If so, it's definitely not the whole picture as so many of us have very different experiences.  While not a button to play with, there's too many instances of hitting the Check Spending Ability button and getting back like $100k approved when charges have been nowhere in that neighborhood (or even time zone).  I type this one so much, I will just quote myself:

 

While CSRs will generally give the blanket answer that your charging ability is based on your spending and payment history with Amex, it's only one factor in Amex's very sophisticated algorithm that determines it, and they are transparent about this in your cardmember agreement and the terms when applying for a charge card: "No pre-set spending limit on purchases does not mean unlimited spending. Your purchases are approved based on a variety of factors, including current spending patterns, your payment history, credit record, and financial resources known to us."

 

Any statements that their formulas are simply based on an average of X spending in the past Y months have been dispelled again and again.  I've gone a long time without using my Platinum card (or very minimally) in the past and then didn't think twice about plopping down a $5-15k charge on it.  I have an AU charge card for work that might see $1000 a month spending for a year or more and then I don't think twice when I need to make a $75k equipment purchase.  Those are approved based upon all of the other factors known to Amex, not previous spending on the card.


When I used to have the Business Platinum card I frequently played with the 'check spending' button, before I learned in this forum that it's not good to play with that button too much. I found it hysterical to be approved for incredibly large numbers unimaginable for my small business, numbers so large that if I ever actually spent that much ... I'd have to leave town Smiley Happy

 

Makes me wonder what goes into that algorithm of theirs. 


Total revolving limits 568220 (504020 reporting) FICO 8: EQ 689 TU 691 EX 682




Message 29 of 38
K-in-Boston
Epic Contributor

Re: Ambiguous Amex Email

😂 Yes, that's a recurring theme (and again why your incident a while back was so out of the norm given most of our experiences).  I remember when they added the "Yes, we'll approve your charge for $X.  In fact we'll approve a charge up to $Y" screen to that a few years back (not sure if it is still like that), my post here was something like "Amex seems to have more confidence in my ability to repay than I do."

Message 30 of 38
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.