No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
imo, it's a bit pretentious to imply a discussion of honor and values is related to a general recommendation to stay off the phone with amex period, but to each his own.
@score_building wrote:imo, it's a bit pretentious to imply a discussion of honor and values is related to a general recommendation to stay off the phone with amex period, but to each his own.
And I find it ironic that the discussion can be about anything BUT honor. After all, "Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences." ~Midori Koto
@Itsmeagain wrote:
@score_building wrote:imo, it's a bit pretentious to imply a discussion of honor and values is related to a general recommendation to stay off the phone with amex period, but to each his own.
And I find it ironic that the discussion can be about anything BUT honor. After all, "Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences." ~Midori Koto
ironic? you seem to believe staying off the phone with amex is dishonorable itsme, if that works for you great. but it is calling, for almost any reason these days, that can have the most negative consequences
the point is to not contact amex while thery're in bi polar mode, not to keep their money itsmeagain, get over it. no one is saying steal or be dishonest, if there was an error it will be resolved without a lofty moral relativistic intervention. you're completely missing the decisive point.
@Anonymous wrote:I'm uncomfortable with a credit that I'm not owed, but at the same time do not want to call Amex unless I absolutely have to. I'd rather not give them a reason to look any more closely at me than they already do.
The OP is not comfortable with keeping something that was not freely given. He received it as a mistake. Is that not the bane of an honorable man? His concern is for the consequences of his decision.
Okay, so maybe I am "pretentious" to insert honor into a discussion about credit. Perhaps I have "missed the decisive point". But I will NOT "get over it". In my house, we still believe and practice "Death before Dishonor".
And your belief that it is OK to just wait and see what happens is not how we would handle the situation. What if it is never corrected? How long do you wait? 1 month?, 2 months?, a year? Soon, the need to resolve the issue will wither and die. And along with that death will be some small portion of your honor. I don't subscribe to character building by avoiding potentially painfull issues. But if you can live with the concequences, go for it.
@Itsmeagain wrote:In my house, we still believe and practice "Death before Dishonor".
i say more power to you, nothing wrong with that.
where is the dishonor in deciding it is not incumbent upon the customer to go chasing after the (in this case bi polar) issuer b4 they have a chance to correct a mistake if one exists?
maybe you can unveil for us how that fits into the overarching "death before dishonor' framework you've set up regarding contacting an issuer immediately vs. first allowing them to resolve a potential discrepancy in its natural course of review.
FTR most bank errors that benefit the customer are caught (without death OR dishonor, at least of or by the customer) and are resolved in relatively short order FWIW.
@Itsmeagain wrote:to character building by avoiding potentially painfull issues. But if you can live with the concequences, go for it.
character building? painful issues? whatever works for you. i am not going to attack your integrity simply because you feel your 'house rules' are the focus of the the thread topic and non family members are somehow 'dishonorable' for staying focused on the amex advice requested: to call or not to call, that was the question.
@score_building wrote:to call or not to call, that was the question.
Question asked, question answered . . . . . several times.