No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I applied for the AA card last month and was denied for LOL/24. The secondary reason was for inquiries (which was considerably lower than new accounts) so Barclays does give some weight to that metric as well.
I already have the Arrival Plus and made sure to put decent spend/activity on it for the 3 months leading up to the application. That didn't matter. Recon didn't budge My TU is 828. Everything else in my profile should've made the app a new account...
EQ | 841 | 5 INQ (Auto, CC, HELOC, 2 mort) | 7y2m |
EX | 812 | 5 INQ (2 CC, 2 mort, HELoan) | 6y11m |
TU | 829 | 4 INQ (3 CC, 1 mort) | 6y6m |
5/24 | 3/12 | AoYA 0m | AoOA 23y6m | ~3% |
@expatCanuck wrote:
I was 6/24 (6/12, actually) when I applied for (and was issued) the Uber. TU INQ's were 6 or so. Scores were in the high 700's / low 800's.
Ten months earlier, I had BT'd a good chunk of change to the Ring; it was either fully or almost fully paid off by the time I applied for the Uber. And my spend on the Ring had been next to nothing.
AAoA was ~7 years; AoOA was ~19 years.
This is why I'm so focused on AAoA. The underwriting seems to loosen up when you cross 5+ year thresholds.
@800FICOGoal wrote:
@expatCanuck wrote:
I was 6/24 (6/12, actually) when I applied for (and was issued) the Uber. TU INQ's were 6 or so. Scores were in the high 700's / low 800's.
Ten months earlier, I had BT'd a good chunk of change to the Ring; it was either fully or almost fully paid off by the time I applied for the Uber. And my spend on the Ring had been next to nothing.
AAoA was ~7 years; AoOA was ~19 years.This is why I'm so focused on AAoA. The underwriting seems to loosen up when you cross 5+ year thresholds.
Whose underwriting are you referring to? Generally from what I've experienced. The AAoA had no real impact on whether I was approved or denied. It had more to do with how each lender judges your credit profile. No two are the same. It would be nice if there were a magic number. After 60 plus apps over the last 3.9 years. I'm pretty confident AAoA isn't a major factor in gaining approvals.
The number of new accounts is the #1 reason for denials. That's if your files are free of derogs and your credit history is reasonable, say 24 months with 3 trade-lines as the base.
I'm no expert by any means. I base my statements purely off what I've experienced.
@Gmood1 wrote:
@800FICOGoal wrote:
@expatCanuck wrote:
I was 6/24 (6/12, actually) when I applied for (and was issued) the Uber. TU INQ's were 6 or so. Scores were in the high 700's / low 800's.
Ten months earlier, I had BT'd a good chunk of change to the Ring; it was either fully or almost fully paid off by the time I applied for the Uber. And my spend on the Ring had been next to nothing.
AAoA was ~7 years; AoOA was ~19 years.This is why I'm so focused on AAoA. The underwriting seems to loosen up when you cross 5+ year thresholds.
Whose underwriting are you referring to? Generally from what I've experienced. The AAoA had no real impact on whether I was approved or denied. It had more to do with how each lender judges your credit profile. No two are the same. It would be nice if there were a magic number. After 60 plus apps over the last 3.9 years. I'm pretty confident AAoA isn't a major factor in gaining approvals.
The number of new accounts is the #1 reason for denials. That's if your files are free of derogs and your credit history is reasonable, say 24 months with 3 trade-lines as the base.
I'm no expert by any means. I base my statements purely off what I've experienced.
I'd agree with you. Your experience pretty much aligns with mine.
BTW I was IIRC at 45/24 when I picked up my Uber Visa with instant approval. Profiles matter.
@coldfusion wrote:
@Gmood1 wrote:
@800FICOGoal wrote:
@expatCanuck wrote:
I was 6/24 (6/12, actually) when I applied for (and was issued) the Uber. TU INQ's were 6 or so. Scores were in the high 700's / low 800's.
Ten months earlier, I had BT'd a good chunk of change to the Ring; it was either fully or almost fully paid off by the time I applied for the Uber. And my spend on the Ring had been next to nothing.
AAoA was ~7 years; AoOA was ~19 years.This is why I'm so focused on AAoA. The underwriting seems to loosen up when you cross 5+ year thresholds.
Whose underwriting are you referring to? Generally from what I've experienced. The AAoA had no real impact on whether I was approved or denied. It had more to do with how each lender judges your credit profile. No two are the same. It would be nice if there were a magic number. After 60 plus apps over the last 3.9 years. I'm pretty confident AAoA isn't a major factor in gaining approvals.
The number of new accounts is the #1 reason for denials. That's if your files are free of derogs and your credit history is reasonable, say 24 months with 3 trade-lines as the base.
I'm no expert by any means. I base my statements purely off what I've experienced.
I'd agree with you. Your experience pretty much aligns with mine.
BTW I was IIRC at 45/24 when I picked up my Uber Visa with instant approval. Profiles matter.
I would echo the above statements. And my experience has been very similar as that of @coldfusion and @Gmood1. Your specific profile, however they slice it and dice it throught that algorithm engine, is what determines the eventual outcome. Strategy is also key. LOL/24 here!
I applied for the Uber Visa back in August and was denied because of new accounts. My Fico 8 were all in mid-high 600's. When I called the recon department and asked about the denial they said it wasn't the inquires,it was because of the 7 new accounts I opened. He suggested I should let them age a year and then reaply if used responsibly. He also said he would refrain from opening any new cards if I want to get that one next . I took it as a great time to garden. I just paid off a bunch of cards and although I am sure my score is going to skyrocket I am going to really try and do what he suggested. I will benefit greatly from this card so it will be worth the wait.