I'm not sure exactly what you are referring to here, but frequently banks and other companies use large multinational banks to act as trustees for certain types of transactions including: legal settlements, bond repayments, interest payments, and other types of funding.
So, if a check you received from Capital One fits into this type of category, then maybe that's why Deutsche Bank was involved.
@astritaho1979 wrote:Well take a look at the checks that c1 issues and you will see that is DeutcheBank Where the money is coming from
Thats funny you mention that. I got a refund check from them today. I requested it to avoid it messing up my utlization since I had a -277.22 credit..... Yes it does have Detsche Bank Trust Company Delaware on the top of it.
I honestly hope everything works out for you and you don't lose anymore cards.
That just means they have an account at DB not that they are owned by them.
That isn't to say DB hasn't invested in them; I do know that a non-trivial number of warehouse lines in US institutions are actually provided by DB but that is different than an ownership stake, basically it's wholesale money to make an analogy to other goods providers.
Too lazy to try to look at the reported financials to figure out if there's a connection, pretty moot in my estimation anyway.
That isn't to say DB hasn't invested in them; I do know that a non-trivial number of warehouse lines in US institutions are actually provided by DB but that is different than an ownership stake, basically it's wholesale money to make an analogy to other goods providers.
Too lazy to try to look at the reported financials to figure out if there's a connection, pretty moot in my estimation anyway.
Alright, I've read a few posts and have concluded that if we take everything "astritaho1979" has claimed to be true...the reason for AA is pretty simple. A BK from 2007, a 30 day late a few years ago, a number of inqs in a short period of time, and having his oldest 12 year old account fall of his credit report probably tanked his total history age and AAoA. Combine this with the fact that he recently got CLI's on some of the cards in a short period of time...it probably spooked the banks.
The 2nd possibility...(and please not the pitchforks again 
) is that the OP is just fabricating cases (such as $125,000 income + $175,000 business accounts, etc). Again no one really knows so we shouldn't judge.
The 3rd possibility is that he has some of the most horrendous luck and really is getting axed.
In any case...these are just some of the possible reasons/answers. No need to get offensive/judgemental/etc.
(Posted this on "US BANK NOT A SERIOUS LENDER" thread as well just so some may see a connection.
@CC365 wrote:Alright, I've read a few posts and have concluded that if we take everything "astritaho1979" has claimed to be true...the reason for AA is pretty simple. A BK from 2007, a 30 day late a few years ago, a number of inqs in a short period of time, and having his oldest 12 year old account fall of his credit report probably tanked his total history age and AAoA. Combine this with the fact that he recently got CLI's on some of the cards in a short period of time...it probably spooked the banks.
The 2nd possibility...(and please not the pitchforks again
The 3rd possibility is that he has some of the most horrendous luck and really is getting axed.
In any case...these are just some of the possible reasons/answers. No need to get offensive/judgemental/etc.
(Posted this on "US BANK NOT A SERIOUS LENDER" thread as well just so some may see a connection.
I'm putting my money on the 2nd possibility! 
