cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.


@Anonymous wrote:

In another thread I had mentioned that I was having lunch with a friend who is a SR VP (US BANK) and that I was looking forward to it because he has been back in Cincinnatti, OH for a week, attending a seminar on new Credit Card policies the bank would be implementing.

 

This seminar he attended was of particular interest to me because he said the cheif speakers were coming from the gaming industry, as US BANK had seen that the gaming business has historically had significant lower losses in the area of credit then any bank.

 

For those of you who do not know I am retired from the gaming industry and the last 16 years of my employment I was involved in making credit decisions to players, so I have a little knowledge of how the gaming industry approcaches it.

 

He stated that first off, US BANK plans on REDUCING its UNSECURED CREDIT that is out now to customers by about 30% during the next 6 months.

Another thing they plan on doing is eliminating AUTOMATIC CLI's. He said the new policy will be CLI's will all be done on an individual basis and will be customer initiated.

 

They plan on EXPANDING their Credit Card base, through a series of cuts to some CL limits. He said that "loss prevention" specialists have stated that they are in a less vulnerable position if instead of 1 customer with a $20,000 CL, they have instead a customer with a $10,000 CL, one with a $5,000 CL, 1 with a $3,000 CL and 1 with a $2,000 CL.

 

Instead on variable interest rates, they will be setting up a "tiered" system of rates, PROBABLY 8.9%, 11.9%, 14.9% and 17.9% depending on a persons credit profile and payment patterns. Of course all CASH EQUIVILENT TRANSACTIONS will be at the highest rate.

 

They are looking at their credit reporting  practices and ways to save money. Perhaps not reporting cards with zero balances or only reporting every 2 months.

 

He also stated that they are looking at other forms of info, then the "traditional credit score" to determine extensions of credit.

 

Also, he said they plan on working closer with other financial institutions in sharing of info (THIS IS THE KEY POINT, he told me they learn from the gaming people).

 

He said more then anything he was PLEASED with the overall tone of the meetings. Through it he learned that YES, credit will still be available to those who deserve it, BUT they will not be "throwing" it at people like was the practice before and has led to the financial conditions we are in at this time.

 

What he said was most bothersome is that it is the consensus of everyone there that the "Credit Bubble" has not reached it's WORSE YET and many more losses are coming due. That is why RESPONSIBLE BANKS and CREDIT CARD ISSUERS are making changes to insure there business survives.

 

Just wanted to share what we talked about. There may not be anything I said that most of you do not already know, but perhaps some of it will be intesesting.

 

OH and he did say that they had hired 17 people from the gaming industry, to work in the areas of "Account Fulfillment" and "Loss Prevention".

 

Maybe us old "casino rats" are useful afterallSmiley Happy

 

 


ok if this is based on the Payment amount of the payment like tdbank does. but what I hearing this, it teirs will based on whims of a payment pattern the lender whats to see,in which case they have define hard rules when highe teirs well be appled such as teir 3

hightest if you util has been 50% for six months or more.

Message 11 of 92
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

 

 

 

 

 

 

rbbyrbsn wrote:

 

ok if this is based on the Payment amount of the payment like tdbank does. but what I hearing this, it teirs will based on whims of a payment pattern the lender whats to see,in which case they have define hard rules when highe teirs well be appled such as teir 3

hightest if you util has been 50% for six months or more.

 

          I am sure they will be. As I recall a new cardholder will be placed in the "interest bracket" that will be determined by their original creditworthiness at the time of application. Then depending on a persons payment performance they can be adjusted either up or down.

 

To me, a system like this is fair instead of lumping everyone into the same rate class. if a person handles their account in a responsible manner, they should be rewarded with a smaller interest rate.

Message 12 of 92
haulingthescoreup
Moderator Emerita

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

As a manic PIF'er, I'd be pretty upset if they stopped reporting cards with $0 balances.

That's what a lot of store cards do, and that's pretty Mickey Mouse, IMO. I can understand the other proposed changes, and in this day and age I'm pretty resigned to them, but I think that if they're going to participate in the credit reporting system, they should report every card every month, regardless of balance.

At the moment, I don't have a US Bank CC. It will be interesting to see how many of these changes do manifest themselves in the next 6-12 months!
* Credit is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. * Who's the boss --you or your credit?
FICO's: EQ 781 - TU 793 - EX 779 (from PSECU) - Done credit hunting; having fun with credit gardening. - EQ 590 on 5/14/2007
Message 13 of 92
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

DickC

 

Thank you for the information.  If the experts believe that the worst of the market is yet to come this is troubling.  In fact this should be a warning to us.  We definately should be paying off our revolving debts and  trying to improve our scores like we are all doing.  this will make us more competitive for the slaughter that is upon us.

Message 14 of 92
haulingthescoreup
Moderator Emerita

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.


Credit-Wise wrote:

... this will make us more competitive for the slaughter that is upon us.



Reminds me of the joke about the two hikers and the bear, and whether they could outrun the bear. All that matters is that one hiker can outrun the other hiker! Smiley Wink (tough on the other hiker, of course)
* Credit is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. * Who's the boss --you or your credit?
FICO's: EQ 781 - TU 793 - EX 779 (from PSECU) - Done credit hunting; having fun with credit gardening. - EQ 590 on 5/14/2007
Message 15 of 92
smallfry
Senior Contributor

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

Zero balances not reported? FICO scoring would have to be seriously reworked if you give it any thought at all. I give this idea 0 chance of ever catching on.
Message 16 of 92
creditwherecreditisdue
Senior Contributor

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

1) USBank was on my wish list and still is. Just moved to a lower position however.

 

2) Be glad there is an FCRA. Any entity sharing information would be considered a CRA and will have to comply.

Message 17 of 92
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.


@creditwherecreditisdue wrote:

1) USBank was on my wish list and still is. Just moved to a lower position however.

 

2) Be glad there is an FCRA. Any entity sharing information would be considered a CRA and will have to comply.


 

I certainly have no worries about any major bank complying with the FCRA. I think what they are considering is a system such as casinos use.

 

It is a little known fact (for VARIOUS REASONS) but 98% of all casinos share information through one CRA, that is set up for their business. The benefit to this is that one casino can see if a person is running around trying to get credit from many different casinos. (Such a person is refered to as a ROUNDER).

 

It also allows a casino to see how much "credit" can be extended to a person. As a rule, the casinos set a "limit" of credit a person is "worth". Say the model they use for determining this is $5,000. What that means in NOT a whole bunch of places will give you $5,000, BUT that is the aggregate amount you will be extended. It may be 1 casino for $5,000, or 5 casinos at $1,000 each, but it will not be something where a person can shop around and apply for more and more credit then they are capable of handling.

 

Because casinos work closely with each other in this area, their losses are low. The key will be if a group of banks think they can work together and still survive. OBVIOUSLY it can be done when all the casinos use one system and they stay competitive. It is just a matter of adjusting your thinking.

 

As for the reporting of accounts with zero balances, I have no doubt that is just a cost saving measure. People have to realize that a CC Company is NOT OBLIGATED to report your account at all. It is their choice, as to when they report it and who they report it to. That is why you often see differences between the 3 main Credit Reporting Agencies.

 

We just have to realize there will be changes coming. I am sure that many people will "over dramatize" them, BUT, my theory is if you pay your bills, are not late, don't exceed your credit limits nor keep looking for credit you have no practical use for, you will be fine.

Message 18 of 92
smallfry
Senior Contributor

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.

**bleep** I am sure that for a nominal fee the bloodsuckers I mean banks would report monthly. How much would it cost monthly? With rare exceptions only a few sub primers don't report monthly. Force paperless statements if need be where possible and stop sending all the unnecessary mail. RU listening BofA? No I don't want your stinking balance transfer checks OK?
Message 19 of 92
haulingthescoreup
Moderator Emerita

Re: Lunch with a banker regarding Credit cards.


DickC wrote:

We just have to realize there will be changes coming. I am sure that many people will "over dramatize" them, BUT, my theory is if you pay your bills, are not late, don't exceed your credit limits nor keep looking for credit you have no practical use for, you will be fine.



But let's extend this not-reporting-$0-balance-cards idea: what if all the banks start doing this? and the credit unions? Many people have an occasional balance reporting on a card, which they then pay off. The less-neurotic members here let all their cards report and then PIF, not worrying about what happens to their scores, as they aren't shopping for credit.

If $0 balance cards aren't reported, we'll always be getting dinged for "too many accounts with balances."

The point is, the FICO scoring system takes into account current credit reporting practices. If these practices are changed, the FICO fomulas will be using insufficient and/or incorrect data to assign risk scores, AKA our FICO's.

I've had lots of CSR's review soft inq reports while on the phone with me, and I like having them say, "Wow, you don't have any debt at all! You really know how to handle your credit cards." By golly, I want that string of $0's to continue to report. Smiley Mad

How 'bout they find a way to cut costs that doesn't negatively impact good consumers...
* Credit is a wonderful servant, but a terrible master. * Who's the boss --you or your credit?
FICO's: EQ 781 - TU 793 - EX 779 (from PSECU) - Done credit hunting; having fun with credit gardening. - EQ 590 on 5/14/2007
Message 20 of 92
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.