No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@iced wrote:
@longtimelurker wrote:I agree, but still, when things change enough, so do long-term strategies. We've seen fairly dedicated UR people here switch, or at least strongly consider, a switch to MR, basically upending their chosen eco system. When partners disappear, or things devalue enough, or a competitor gets much stronger, long-term cards can get dropped very suddenly!
People who let their travel be dictated by their cards will probably switch ecosystems in a significant nerfing. People who let their travel dictate their cards, not so much. A career United flyer isn't going to jump ship to Delta and MR just because of DoorDash or a $100 AF increase, just as career Delta flyers stuck with American Express even before their recent boosts. Partner changes can affect that, but those are fairly unusual.
Could someone re-evaluate every 5-10 years? Sure, but that's a far cry from the world of the LOL/24's around here who don't stay anywhere much longer than a year.
Not to derail but a lot of flyers don't necessarily choose one airline over another because of personal preference but choose due to lack of options. Dulles International Airport is a United hub and flyers out of their can't just hop on Delta and fly directly where ever they want. Unless you want layovers flying Delta or American Airlines you are very likely going to have to fly United out of Dulles.
@Deuter wrote:
The best credit card imho is a No-AF fee that you can keep for years to come with minimal maintenance from a reputable lender. Think Bank of America Cash Rewards or Travel Rewards. Products that doesn’t change often. Ideally would be a MC/Visa.
Can be Citi, Cap 1 etc but a card in a major bank to have access to PC if needed. “At the moment” such as the Prestige, CSR can devalue bad, anything travel with AF are the first to be cut in benefits.
A normal card, no AF providing you have banking relationship with some multiplier would be the best to keep as oldest accounts. Also as the lender grows in size, it has a variety of PC available and branches where you can service your oldest card.
Interesting! I would never consider that as a criterion for myself, I have never had to go to a branch for anything cc related, but I guess some people do (but IMO, internet banks for banking are the way to go anyway!)
While there is value on having an oldest card that you can keep free of charge and low maintenance, in general to me this always raises the question of what is the real value of a score. So in one extreme scenario I can have an old no rewards (or say 1% to be nice) card that I keep to maintain a higher AAoA and thus score, in the other I focus on cards with big gains, either SUBs and/or earnings, and worry much less about scores. Which is "best" for the purposes of the thread!
IMO, a slightly careful version of the second is best: taking care before any mortgage is on the horizon to make sure the score doesn't dip too low.
@longtimelurker wrote:
@Deuter wrote:
The best credit card imho is a No-AF fee that you can keep for years to come with minimal maintenance from a reputable lender.While there is value on having an oldest card that you can keep free of charge and low maintenance, in general to me this always raises the question of what is the real value of a score. So in one extreme scenario I can have an old no rewards (or say 1% to be nice) card that I keep to maintain a higher AAoA and thus score, in the other I focus on cards with big gains, either SUBs and/or earnings, and worry much less about scores. Which is "best" for the purposes of the thread!
IMO, a slightly careful version of the second is best
I think both are not only valid answers but would also say that over time, for most consumers, both become more important. And they can (and should) coexisit. I have older cards that offer less "cash-back" or other benefits from my newer cards. But in many ways, I more highly value the older cards that help anchor my AAoA and stabilize my credit scores. They are harder to replace! If I can't PC them into more useful alternatives, the older cards will never get the amount of spending of the younger more rewarding cards. But I keep them around and use them some just to maintain them for my overall credit health.
It is subjective but I am glad I am not the only one who think the ability to PC is an important criteria.
Visa = MC > AmEx >>> Discover
National Bank CC >>> Regional Bank CC
Issuer allows PC
No AF or has downgrade path to no AF card
Ideally from a bank that has a wide range of products
Overall I like CCs that are well accepted, adaptable, can change and grow with me financially and I don't mean just CL.
@FieryDance wrote:... I am glad I am not the only one who think the ability to PC is an important criteria.
Visa = MC > AmEx >>> Discover
National Bank CC >>> Regional Bank CC
Issuer allows PC
No AF or has downgrade path to no AF card
Ideally from a bank that has a wide range of products
Overall I like CCs that are well accepted, adaptable, can change and grow with me financially and I don't mean just CL.
Yes, all my four oldest currently open cards (19-27 years) have been PC'd at least once.
And yes, the big national banks are more likely to adapt to competition
and refresh their offerings, as well as offer the most upgrade/downgrade paths.
This reminds me of a recent thread about the "Big Banks" I did a little research and posted about. I came up with the "Big Five" banks. Yes, it is somewhat subjective, but I have data and explanation behind it. By far, the largest lenders in terms of bank size (assets), cards issued (total numbers issued, types, variety of offerings, and competitiveness), or both were (in alphabetical order to be fair):
AMEX (26th largest bank in assets; 3rd largest card issuer)
BofA (2nd largest bank in assets; 5th largest card issuer)
Citi (4th largest bank in assets; largest card issuer)
Chase (largest bank in assets; 2nd largest card issuer)
Wells Fargo (3rd largest bank in assets; 8th largest card issuer)
There are reasons I left off some other popular names from my "First Team" including U.S. Bank, Discover, Capital One, and Synchrony. That's not saying the "Second" or "Third" teams are not good banks; they are just not in the credit card game the same way the "First" team is in the game. I also like having cards with credit unions too, especially the largest ones like NFCU (#1 in US) and PenFed (#3 in US). Similar to the large banks, they tend to offer competive products and service. That's why NFCU and PenFed were in my "Second" team list alongside US Bank, Discover, Capital One. See the link for more discussion and comparison.
Original Thread:
https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/List-of-Major-Bank-Cards/m-p/5803770#M1679615
It's interesting that the new merger between SunTrust and BB&T will form the 6th largest bank (named Truist). For now, their cards are staying status-quo but I expect them to offer some new cards and shake up their offerings to become more competive with the largest lenders. I think that will probably move those two banks from my "Third Team" list to "Second Team."
P.S. As an aside, @FieryDance I like your new Avatar. It fits you well.
@FieryDance wrote:It is subjective but I am glad I am not the only one who think the ability to PC is an important criteria.
Visa = MC > AmEx >>> Discover
National Bank CC >>> Regional Bank CC
Issuer allows PC
No AF or has downgrade path to no AF card
Ideally from a bank that has a wide range of products
Overall I like CCs that are well accepted, adaptable, can change and grow with me financially and I don't mean just CL.
While I agree that the ability to PC from an AF card to a no-AF is certainly nice-to-have, in other cases a PC to the card you want might not be available when you want it. Also, I think few banks actually have a blanket "No PC" policy (Sync?) the others have things like "PC only in this family" or "No PC to or from card X at this time", so it's hard for me to consider it a firm requirement. Even in the AF case, if necessary I can close, and maybe transfer the limit (another discussion point!)