No clue all of this activity on patent infringements was taking place related to Mobile banking? Sure glad you gave us a "heads up" on this 
@Anonymous wrote:While I don't use this feature hardly ever, maybe twice in the pst 5 years for an oddball check I've received. But if I had to pay to use the serice, then I'd pass. And just walk, I mena drive to the Bank and do it the old fashioned way.
And while I do feel that people should be compensated for their work/ideas that has gone into a patent. How would other Banks be able to make Features like this cost effective yet remain free for their cistomers?
I'm not saying I feel sorry for one bank from another, they're all crooks IMO. I'm just curious what “pay their fair share” really means.
Cost most likely wouldn't be passed on to the end user other than the fees one already sometimes pays on accounts which can be gotten around through a variety of twerks.
I'm a little leery of USAA's case here, good grief it's nothing more than what amounts to some OCR on a picture and we've been doing that for a long time... admittedly there's a lot of checks that need to go into determining if it's a legit check but that's solveable, and if USAA wrote the code to do it, and then it was pilfered by Wells or anyone else, then yes royalty/license fees should be paid just like any other infringement of IP.
I just can't believe it cost that much in development. 200 million in damages? I don't understand how it cost that much for that feature to be built in the first place.
@VPExecutive wrote:The respect boat for USAA sailed a long time ago... They're a joke now.
All started when they closed my 3 credit cards and my checking account without notice and out of the blue. I lost my Limitless card (which they also stopped allowing applciations for, another joke).
Suing one bank because they use the mobile deposit feature? Almost every financial institution has mobile deposit now. Why Wells Fargo?
They are a joke because they shut you down? What was the reason for the shutdown?
