No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
US Bancorp tells the Supreme Court that mismanaging its pension plan didn’t injure anyone
If you’re paying into a retirement fund—or just wish you were—you might think that its managers invest wisely, listen to advisers, and follow the law. And you’d probably expect that the fund managers would face the consequences if they’re shifty and put your benefits at risk.
But it ain’t necessarily so. Or so said counsel for US Bancorp (USB) on Jan. 13 at the Supreme Court, where justices heard oral arguments in a case that pits the bank against beneficiaries of its retirement fund.
The beneficiaries sued for $748 million to restore their pension fund after discovering that, in 2008, managers mishandled money, violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and leaving their plan underfunded. Managers ignored investment guidance. They lost $1.1 billion after plowing nearly half of the assets into Bancorp’s own mutual funds—which is self-dealing and illegal—and all fund assets into high-risk equities.
But the bank’s lawyer urged the Supreme Court to find the beneficiaries can’t sue.
Here is the link to the actual Supreme Court summary of the case: Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Just when you thought WF was a horrible institustion for what they did...
Seems you truly cannot trust any Bank.
@Anonymous wrote:Just when you thought WF was a horrible institustion for what they did...
Seems you truly cannot trust any Bank.
The precedent it sets if USB prevails is alarming; it is incredibly harmful to pension participants. The Supreme Court justices seem appropriately skeptical of USB's arguments, but you never know...the lower courts bought it...
You would think that the fund managers have a fiduciary responsibility to the beneficiaries of the retirement plan. It sounds like the fund managers were looking after the interests of USB and not the fund beneficiaries. Shame on USB!