No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Hello,
I can't find anything about why one of my accounts included in BK7 from 8/2015, Chase, is reporting as 9 charge offs on my EX report. I believe it is why despite my otherwise perfect credit + BK public record cannot push me over 700. I have done EVEYTHING to improve my credit including:
Under 6% Utilization, 1 auto loan, 5 CCs with nearly 3 yrs, 1 CC 6months, Total CC limit = 22,000, Experian Boost, no missed payments on any of my open accounts, 2 hard inquiries (>6 months). I do know for a fact that there are people with BK7 that have 750 or so despite the public record BK7 showing. There is another closed account that conveniently shows negative only the same month I filed bankruptcy. I feel like there is something very wrong with how Chase is reporting to the CRA. Please if someone has any answers about the 9 chargeoffs on one account, please let me know. I appreciate ANY info at all. Thank you!
Do you mean that they are making updating reporting each month that the status is CO, and/or that multiple prior months under payment history profile show as CO?
If so, that is proper reporting of the status as being delinquent for that month, and also that it was, at some prior point in time, charged to profil and loss. It is not the reporting of multiple charge-offs.
The CRA reporting manual provides creditors the option, after a CO has been taken, to report CO as the delinquency status as an alternative to reporting delinquency in terms of days, such as 90-late, 120-late, etc. That can continue until the debt is paid or sold.
When or did you stop paying on the account before filing? Any negs before filing stays intact. Now if it was up to date then Chase is in the wrong. Creditors are not allowed to report your debt in a variety of ways that could cause your credit to suffer after filing. Listings them as currently owed, late, delinquent, outstanding charged off, having a balance due, converted to a new type of debt (re-aged) or given new account numbers, for example. Then its time to contact your lawyer. No negs can be listed after the file date and must say IIB and 0 balance.
Thanks, I learned something. I had the same question for one of my accounts.
@RobertEG wrote:Do you mean that they are making updating reporting each month that the status is CO, and/or that multiple prior months under payment history profile show as CO?
If so, that is proper reporting of the status as being delinquent for that month, and also that it was, at some prior point in time, charged to profil and loss. It is not the reporting of multiple charge-offs.
The CRA reporting manual provides creditors the option, after a CO has been taken, to report CO as the delinquency status as an alternative to reporting delinquency in terms of days, such as 90-late, 120-late, etc. That can continue until the debt is paid or sold.
So what date was the first of the late payments posted compared to your file date? Better not be after file date. And when was the last payment before the file date?
It's not counting it as 9 separate charge offs, it's just reporting as a CO every month after it exceeded the 120+ late stage and was actually charged off. Now, if as FireMedic and others have said, this is reporting AFTER your BK, then that is illegal and you should contact your lawyer. But if it is accurate in the sense that the account hadn't been paid on and was CO'd prior to BK filing, then there is nothing that can be done I'm afraid.