Tydawg is correct.
FCRA 623(a)(2) places a statutory requirement on any party who has furnished information to a CRA to thereafter "promptly" update that information as necessary to maintain its current accuracy.
The CRAs will normally not change any reporting based on a communication from the consumer, even if a letter from the furnisher is provided.
The burden is on the furnisher to update their own reporting.
As for the copy of the account info, it is not as blatantly inaccurate as it might appear.
The statement that an account is "derogatory" is an interpretation provided by th party who produced the credit report.
It is not something that is per se reported by the creditor.
An account that has any adverse information in its history can be referred to as a "derogatory" acccount.
The account apparently had a prior 30-late that is less than 7 years ago, and that derog continues to be reported.
That does not mean that the account has a current delinquency status.
To clarify what is actully reported by the creditor, when an account is delinquent, is has a current status of delinquent at that level.
When the account is thereafter returned to good-standing, the prior delinquency is maintained in the payment history profile, and the current status becomes paid or pays as agreed. The derog status prior to the new current status is retained under a code called the Payment Rating, which would for the posted scenario be 30-llate.
Thus, the account would, once paid, have a currrent status of paid, a payment rating of 30-late, and a payment history profile still showing the prior 30-late.
In that regard, the vendor of the credit report can accurately refer to the account as derogatory.
The statement in the credit report is not itself subject to dispute, as it was not "reported" by the creditor per se, and not an actual element of your credit file.
I would expect no changes to be made as a result of a dispute of the categorization of an account with reported delinquencies as being "derogatory."
