cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."

tag
Subexistence
Established Contributor

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Anonymous wrote:

@SubexistenceYou need to have at least 11 accounts to be in the green. Some people with OCD will need at least 21 to feel better. There's absolutely no reason related to scoring to get at least 11 acounts. I can understand something like 0-3 accounts being in the red but 0-10 doesn't make sense.

I mostly agree with what you're saying above, especially with respect to 21+ being ideal according to the CK fluff chart.  Again, further manipulation of the member to always believe that "more is better" and with CC ads in your face at all times many people likely just say, "why not?" and apply unnecessarily

 

In another thread recently, though, I was discussing with TT the FICO negative reason statement, "too many or too few accounts."  This statement suggests that having not enough accounts or too many can adversely impact your FICO scores.  What these numbers are, though, we are unsure of.  TT had estimated that the sweet spot range could very well be in the 10-20 range, where that reason statement may be generated at values below 10 or over 20.  That being said, I (and probably TT, too) don't believe that any penalty associated with too many or too few accounts is significant; perhaps it impacts score 5 points or so... but of course, that could be profile-dependent.


Do you think that our binary classification of thin vs thick could be obsolete? Like there could be thin 0-4, thick 5-9, thickest 10-20, too thick 20+. Or do you think the reason that the 10-20 range is not related to thin/thick scorecards








Starting Score: Ex08-732,Eq08-713,Tu08-717
Current Score:Ex08-795,Eq08-807,Tu08-787,EX98-761,Eq04-742
Goal Score: Ex98-760,Eq04-760


Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

History of my credit
Message 11 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Subexistence

Do you think that our binary classification of thin vs thick could be obsolete? Like there could be thin 0-4, thick 5-9, thickest 10-20, too thick 20+. Or do you think the reason that the 10-20 range is not related to thin/thick scorecards


I do not.  Thick verses thin is still a factor for scorecard assignment.  Once "thick" is achieved, though, be it at 3 accounts, 4, whatever, at that point I believe the "too many or too few accounts" reason statement could still remain depending on the number of accounts present.

Message 12 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."

For what it is worth, only a short while ago the myFICO website was just like Credit Karma in the way that it pushed people to get more and more cards.  The banner at the top of every page was a gateway for more cards, with really huge buttons inducing people to apply; and myFICO got a kickback from the issuer for every application. 

 

Not long ago that was removed to a different part of the website: you now have to go to the Savings Center button to get the CC app page.  (And yes, there is something a little funny about the page that induces you to expand your capacity to incur debt being named the Savings Center.)

Message 13 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."

I suppose most if not all of these CMS providers initiate this type of ploy.  I get why they do it, but I'm looking it from a far different angle than the majority.  The majority of people that fall prey to these sites are those that have come to them due to being either brand new to credit or in a place of unfavorable credit.  That being said, many don't understand the ins and outs yet, so they are perfect targets for these CMS sources to push products on.

Message 14 of 39
Subexistence
Established Contributor

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Anonymous wrote:

I suppose most if not all of these CMS providers initiate this type of ploy.  I get why they do it, but I'm looking it from a far different angle than the majority.  The majority of people that fall prey to these sites are those that have come to them due to being either brand new to credit or in a place of unfavorable credit.  That being said, many don't understand the ins and outs yet, so they are perfect targets for these CMS sources to push products on.


I wonder if some of them are prepping for a mortgage and were trying to see their scores. 








Starting Score: Ex08-732,Eq08-713,Tu08-717
Current Score:Ex08-795,Eq08-807,Tu08-787,EX98-761,Eq04-742
Goal Score: Ex98-760,Eq04-760


Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

History of my credit
Message 15 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."

Some, I'm sure. 

 

I do think if we took a poll on here of why people came to MF (or CK, whatever) that the Family Feud #1 answer would be to improve their credit profile/scores.  

Message 16 of 39
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Anonymous wrote:

Hey BBS.  I have been thinking for some time about creating a thread called Credit Karma -- How to Use It.  It'd be nice for newcomers to have a go-to thread that would explain what Karma is really good for, and what they need to ignore.  If I do I will run it by you first.

 


Don't forget to include TransUnion CBIS as part of the how to use it. It looks like that is the only source available these days for CBIS.

Many similarities but also many differences between TU CBIS and the CBIS market leader, LexisNexis.

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 17 of 39
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Anonymous wrote:

@SubexistenceYou need to have at least 11 accounts to be in the green. Some people with OCD will need at least 21 to feel better. There's absolutely no reason related to scoring to get at least 11 acounts. I can understand something like 0-3 accounts being in the red but 0-10 doesn't make sense.

I mostly agree with what you're saying above, especially with respect to 21+ being ideal according to the CK fluff chart.  Again, further manipulation of the member to always believe that "more is better" and with CC ads in your face at all times many people likely just say, "why not?" and apply unnecessarily

 

In another thread recently, though, I was discussing with TT the FICO negative reason statement, "too many or too few accounts."  This statement suggests that having not enough accounts or too many can adversely impact your FICO scores.  What these numbers are, though, we are unsure of.  TT had estimated that the sweet spot range could very well be in the 10-20 range, where that reason statement may be generated at values below 10 or over 20.  That being said, I (and probably TT, too) don't believe that any penalty associated with too many or too few accounts is significant; perhaps it impacts score 5 points or so... but of course, that could be profile-dependent.


I have 7 open accounts (5 CC cards, a loan and an AU card) plus two closed ones. Fico says I have "too few accounts with recent payment information" (which probably is referring to open accounts). I got this negative statement every month for over a year - until taking a HP late last year for a CLI. I am clearly missing out on some Fico 8 points because of this (5 points?). Might be costing me 10 points on VantageScore 3.0.

 

EQ Fico 08 BC 12-2016.jpg

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 18 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."


@Thomas_Thumb wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

Hey BBS.  I have been thinking for some time about creating a thread called Credit Karma -- How to Use It.  It'd be nice for newcomers to have a go-to thread that would explain what Karma is really good for, and what they need to ignore.  If I do I will run it by you first.

 


Don't forget to include TransUnion CBIS as part of the how to use it. It looks like that is the only source available these days for CBIS.

Many similarities but also many differences between TU CBIS and the CBIS market leader, LexisNexis.


Yup.  That was absolutely on my radar as one of the very nice features of CK.  CK is the only cost-free service where you can get frequent EQ reports as well as the TU CBIS.

 

In addition, it has some features that are also available elsewhere, but are really nice to have, such as frequent TU reports and alerts for new accounts (most people say that Karma's alerts are far quicker than myFICO's). 

 

I am even much less opposed than many people to someone making use of the CK front end interface, as long as he has been prepped carefully (e.g. by a How-To guide) on what to use and what to ignore.  For example....

 

CK's CC utilization metric is good and helpful, as long as the consumer:

      * has no closed accounts with balances

      * has no AU accounts

      * understands that percents close to a CC breakpoint could be off due to a rounding error, specifically 0%, 9%, 29%, 49%, etc.

 

Age of credit profile (i.e. Age of Oldest Account) is good and helpful as long as the consumer is certain that his oldest account is open.

 

Even the AAoA metric might be valuable if he's determined that his closed accounts have an average age that is fairly close to his open accounts.  

 

The interface is really nice to the extent that it enables you to locate and drill down into specific accounts quickly.

 

My feeling is that CK has especial value for beginners (or even stingy old-timers) as a site that pairs well with creditScore.com.  Karma gives you free EQ and TU reports, and CS.com gives you free EX reports (along with a free FICO 8).

Message 19 of 39
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Why Credit Karma manipulates "payment history."

Thanks for weighing in, TT. CKs recommendation for 10-20 accounts I don't believe is a terrible thing, but showing 21+ as also being ideal (suggesting an infinite amount is fine) is misleading for sure and no doubt promts unnecessary credit apps.
Message 20 of 39
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.