No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I have a case where the homebuyer has a bankruptcy chapter 7 in 2013. Their first and second lien mortgages got caught in it. Discharged bk in 2013. They kept making home payments for the first mortgage. Neither were reaffirmed. He sold the home this past December, and it was not a foreclosure, transfer of deed in lieu or a short sale. He paid off both liens and was able to get money out of the sale.
However, when trying to verify their mortgage history we are being told its protected under the bk, and that he was not obligated to pay the second lien. He may also have had some 30 day lates on the primary but nothing too bad that it would warrant a foreclosure.
Is a verification of mortgage still needed if they were not obligated to pay it?
I've run into this myself dozens of times over my career. It sounds like the AUS has given you an Refer/Eligible and unless you have a situation where the borrower was living rent free or can show at least a 12 month satisfactory rental or mortgage history, you are going to hit a brick wall. Were the late payments within the last 12 months? If not you're going to fine. If so, good luck!
So they rented out that home for 1.5 years till they closed on it in March. For those 1.5 years they were renting and making payments on it on time per their VOR for 18 months. AUS is running approve eligible but I was under the impression it was a manual downgrade if a mortgage does not show on there or if there are lates. They have 2 30 day lates in last 12 months. Is there something that can be done?
@Anonymous wrote:I have a case where the homebuyer has a bankruptcy chapter 7 in 2013. Their first and second lien mortgages got caught in it. Discharged bk in 2013. They kept making home payments for the first mortgage. Neither were reaffirmed. He sold the home this past December, and it was not a foreclosure, transfer of deed in lieu or a short sale. He paid off both liens and was able to get money out of the sale.
However, when trying to verify their mortgage history we are being told its protected under the bk, and that he was not obligated to pay the second lien. He may also have had some 30 day lates on the primary but nothing too bad that it would warrant a foreclosure.
Is a verification of mortgage still needed if they were not obligated to pay it?
The short answer is yes, the VOM is required.
The long answer why.
Here are the FHA guidelines:
Accept Risk Classifications Requiring a Downgrade to Manual Underwriting (TOTAL)
The Mortgagee must downgrade and manually underwrite any Mortgage that received an Accept recommendation if:
Housing Obligations/Mortgage Payment History (TOTAL)
Housing Obligation/Mortgage Payment refers to the monthly payment due for rental or Properties owned.
A Mortgage Payment is considered delinquent if not paid within the month due.
The Mortgage must be downgraded to a Refer and manually underwritten if any mortgage trade line, including mortgage line-of-credit payments, during the most recent 12 months reflects:
A Mortgage that has been modified must utilize the payment history in accordance with the modification agreement for the time period of modification in determining late housing payments.
Undisclosed Mortgage Debt (TOTAL)
When an existing debt or obligation that is secured by a Mortgage but is not listed on the credit report and not considered by the AUS is revealed during the application process, the Mortgagee must obtain a verification of Mortgage directly from the Servicer. The Mortgage must be downgraded to a Refer and manually underwritten if the mortgage history reflects:
A Mortgage that has been modified must utilize the payment history in accordance with the modification agreement for the time period of modification in determining late Mortgage Payment.
I am telling you, I've had several deals like this and wasn't given a downgrade. They were absolved of the debt and you have an VOR as I understand it. This deal can get done.