cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

tag
Citylights18
Valued Contributor

Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

I think the currenty fallacy is that the only way to build wealth is by doing it by buy and hold long term in the stock market.

 

Is it possible to do it in real estate, particularly if you start early. You just have to be able to buy affordable properties and with time build equity in those positions. Hold onto them as long as you can as rentals and use the equity for your next down payment.

 

Let's say you can get first time homebuyer 0% financing at 6% at a mortgage that is 1,000 a month. Use the extra money to pay down the mortgage and refinance it to 4.5% once you have 20% equity in the property. Then take a HELOC on that property to put money down on another property, pay off the HELOC and repeat.

 

You can still be subject to a housing market crash but if the prices aren't too high you should be able to ride it out over the long term. At least you wouldn't also be getting killed on the market at the same time. 

Official travel point totals as of 12/26/23 (1,382,693 Total Points)
Chase Ultimate Rewards 661,525 | IHG One Rewards 144,443 | Hilton Honors 143,801 | AMEX Membership Rewards 102,729 | World of Hyatt 90,413 | Marriott Bonvoy 65,343 | Citi Thank You 62,712 | Wells Fargo Rewards 33,652 | Southwest Rapid Rewards 28,105 | United MileagePlus 13,316 | British Airways Avios 12,333 | Jet Blue TrueBlue 11,661 | NASA Platinum Rewards 1,883 | AA Advantage 1,744 | Navy Federal Rewards 792 | Delta Sky Miles 175 | Virgin Atlantic Virgin Points 100 | Lowes Business Rewards 6,992 ($69.92) | Amazon Rewards 475 ($4.75) | Discover CB 499 ($4.99)
Message 1 of 16
15 REPLIES 15
iced
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?


@Citylights18 wrote:

I think the currenty fallacy is that the only way to build wealth is by doing it by buy and hold long term in the stock market.

 

Is it possible to do it in real estate, particularly if you start early. You just have to be able to buy affordable properties and with time build equity in those positions. Hold onto them as long as you can as rentals and use the equity for your next down payment.

 

Let's say you can get first time homebuyer 0% financing at 6% at a mortgage that is 1,000 a month. Use the extra money to pay down the mortgage and refinance it to 4.5% once you have 20% equity in the property. Then take a HELOC on that property to put money down on another property, pay off the HELOC and repeat.

 

You can still be subject to a housing market crash but if the prices aren't too high you should be able to ride it out over the long term. At least you wouldn't also be getting killed on the market at the same time. 


People can and have done the real estate approach to building wealth before, and there's a lot of information out there (good and bad) about how people succeed at it, but the general path is what you described: acquire a property, rent it out to generate a positive cash flow, rinse and repeat.

 

In the end, it's just as fraught with risk as going with stocks. The general pros and cons of going real estate are:

 

Pros:

- It's more friendly to leveraging. People with little cash to start with can finance with rates generally more favorable and long-term than margin.

- Real estate is generally less volatile than stocks.

- Less assets are required to generate significant cash flow. Rent tends to be a higher percentage of invested capital than dividends.

 

Cons:

- Most people who go this route don't own much of their wealth, the bank does. That is, they're sitting on $10-20 million in property but owe half that to lenders.

- It's not as passive as stocks. You have to be a landlord or carve out another 10-15% to pay someone else to be a landlord.

- It's not liquid.

- Maintenance costs can erode profits, especially if you have frequent turnover or bad tenants.

 

Taxes can also get pretty complicated with RE (even moreso than with stocks). If you do enough write-offs and deductions, you can possibly realize most of your gains tax-free unlike stocks, but cash-flow gains (that is, not the sale of the property) are taxed as income instead of cap gains.

Message 2 of 16
CH-7-Mission-Accomplished
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?


@iced wrote:

@Citylights18 wrote:

I think the currenty fallacy is that the only way to build wealth is by doing it by buy and hold long term in the stock market.

 

Is it possible to do it in real estate, particularly if you start early. You just have to be able to buy affordable properties and with time build equity in those positions. Hold onto them as long as you can as rentals and use the equity for your next down payment.

 

Let's say you can get first time homebuyer 0% financing at 6% at a mortgage that is 1,000 a month. Use the extra money to pay down the mortgage and refinance it to 4.5% once you have 20% equity in the property. Then take a HELOC on that property to put money down on another property, pay off the HELOC and repeat.

 

You can still be subject to a housing market crash but if the prices aren't too high you should be able to ride it out over the long term. At least you wouldn't also be getting killed on the market at the same time. 


People can and have done the real estate approach to building wealth before, and there's a lot of information out there (good and bad) about how people succeed at it, but the general path is what you described: acquire a property, rent it out to generate a positive cash flow, rinse and repeat.

 

In the end, it's just as fraught with risk as going with stocks. The general pros and cons of going real estate are:

 

Pros:

- It's more friendly to leveraging. People with little cash to start with can finance with rates generally more favorable and long-term than margin.

- Real estate is generally less volatile than stocks.

- Less assets are required to generate significant cash flow. Rent tends to be a higher percentage of invested capital than dividends.

 

Cons:

- Most people who go this route don't own much of their wealth, the bank does. That is, they're sitting on $10-20 million in property but owe half that to lenders.

- It's not as passive as stocks. You have to be a landlord or carve out another 10-15% to pay someone else to be a landlord.

- It's not liquid.

- Maintenance costs can erode profits, especially if you have frequent turnover or bad tenants.

 

Taxes can also get pretty complicated with RE (even moreso than with stocks). If you do enough write-offs and deductions, you can possibly realize most of your gains tax-free unlike stocks, but cash-flow gains (that is, not the sale of the property) are taxed as income instead of cap gains.



@iced wrote:

@Citylights18 wrote:

I think the currenty fallacy is that the only way to build wealth is by doing it by buy and hold long term in the stock market.

 

Is it possible to do it in real estate, particularly if you start early. You just have to be able to buy affordable properties and with time build equity in those positions. Hold onto them as long as you can as rentals and use the equity for your next down payment.

 

Let's say you can get first time homebuyer 0% financing at 6% at a mortgage that is 1,000 a month. Use the extra money to pay down the mortgage and refinance it to 4.5% once you have 20% equity in the property. Then take a HELOC on that property to put money down on another property, pay off the HELOC and repeat.

 

You can still be subject to a housing market crash but if the prices aren't too high you should be able to ride it out over the long term. At least you wouldn't also be getting killed on the market at the same time. 


People can and have done the real estate approach to building wealth before, and there's a lot of information out there (good and bad) about how people succeed at it, but the general path is what you described: acquire a property, rent it out to generate a positive cash flow, rinse and repeat.

 

In the end, it's just as fraught with risk as going with stocks. The general pros and cons of going real estate are:

 

Pros:

- It's more friendly to leveraging. People with little cash to start with can finance with rates generally more favorable and long-term than margin.

- Real estate is generally less volatile than stocks.

- Less assets are required to generate significant cash flow. Rent tends to be a higher percentage of invested capital than dividends.

 

Cons:

- Most people who go this route don't own much of their wealth, the bank does. That is, they're sitting on $10-20 million in property but owe half that to lenders.

- It's not as passive as stocks. You have to be a landlord or carve out another 10-15% to pay someone else to be a landlord.

- It's not liquid.

- Maintenance costs can erode profits, especially if you have frequent turnover or bad tenants.

 

Taxes can also get pretty complicated with RE (even moreso than with stocks). If you do enough write-offs and deductions, you can possibly realize most of your gains tax-free unlike stocks, but cash-flow gains (that is, not the sale of the property) are taxed as income instead of cap gains.


Very well laid out.

Message 3 of 16
Citylights18
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

I guess another drawback is that it takes experience with taxes, real estate prospecting, lease agreements to be effective at it.

 

A lot of people get into a bunch of cheap rentals. I think you might be better off with vacation rentals that can pay for themselves fully booked in 3 months.

Official travel point totals as of 12/26/23 (1,382,693 Total Points)
Chase Ultimate Rewards 661,525 | IHG One Rewards 144,443 | Hilton Honors 143,801 | AMEX Membership Rewards 102,729 | World of Hyatt 90,413 | Marriott Bonvoy 65,343 | Citi Thank You 62,712 | Wells Fargo Rewards 33,652 | Southwest Rapid Rewards 28,105 | United MileagePlus 13,316 | British Airways Avios 12,333 | Jet Blue TrueBlue 11,661 | NASA Platinum Rewards 1,883 | AA Advantage 1,744 | Navy Federal Rewards 792 | Delta Sky Miles 175 | Virgin Atlantic Virgin Points 100 | Lowes Business Rewards 6,992 ($69.92) | Amazon Rewards 475 ($4.75) | Discover CB 499 ($4.99)
Message 4 of 16
iced
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?


@Citylights18 wrote:

I guess another drawback is that it takes experience with taxes, real estate prospecting, lease agreements to be effective at it.

 

A lot of people get into a bunch of cheap rentals. I think you might be better off with vacation rentals that can pay for themselves fully booked in 3 months.


Vacation rentals are arguably even more risky:

 

- The homes people will rent for vacation don't come as cheap. You'll be able to pick up several duplexes in the midwest for less than one cottage in a Lake Tahoe or Park City type of place.

 

- Tenants in short-term rentals tend to treat the place worse than tenants who actually live in the place for a year. For every professional couple or family that's renting, there's a bachelerette party or dudebro weekend renting.

 

- Many HOAs and even entire cities are cracking down on AirBnB landlords by putting in restrictions about who or what can be let for short-term.

Message 5 of 16
longtimelurker
Epic Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

And housing crashes are real, and, in some areas of the country, take a VERY long time, if ever to recover.     One (probably good) piece of advice for stock investing for those who don't know all that much is to invest in cheap index funds of various caps for diversity.   Buying real estate is very much like buying an individual stock: great if you know what you are doing and/or are lucky, not so much otherwise.

Message 6 of 16
GatorGuy
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

The fallacy is to be concentrated into one type of investment. You should diversify across stocks, bonds, residential/commercial RE, start ups, etcs. 

Message 7 of 16
Citylights18
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

The problem with the stocks and say crypto is that most buyers don't take a look at the macroeconomic cycle and just go all in thinking the more money they put in the more money they'll eventually make on it. I have a friend that went all in on Etherum when it was 3,500 in April and now its trading for half. He could have used that money to pay down a real estate loan and saved himself interest. Anytime you make an extra payment against a loan you are getting a return on that money equal to the interest saved.

 

Property number 1 for example costs you 200k but the DP was 5% first time homebuyer program (10,000) which has to be repaid in full to be able to sell. The buyer then spends two years paying off the homebuyer grant. The property has appreciated to 220,000 and they have 10,000 more in equity (owe 180k on a 220k) property. Then they could take a HELOC on the first property for 25,000 and use it as a DP for a 300,000 dollar property while renting out the first home.

 

After five years the first property has appreciated to 245,000 and the mortgage is down to 165,000. Then at their second property its appreciated to 325,000 and they owe 250,000 with the HELOC on property 1 paid. Before age 30 a buyer could have over 150,000 in equity just with picking up a couple of lower priced properties. 

 

Real estate if anything becomes a time in market thing. If you get started early it will help you later in life.

Official travel point totals as of 12/26/23 (1,382,693 Total Points)
Chase Ultimate Rewards 661,525 | IHG One Rewards 144,443 | Hilton Honors 143,801 | AMEX Membership Rewards 102,729 | World of Hyatt 90,413 | Marriott Bonvoy 65,343 | Citi Thank You 62,712 | Wells Fargo Rewards 33,652 | Southwest Rapid Rewards 28,105 | United MileagePlus 13,316 | British Airways Avios 12,333 | Jet Blue TrueBlue 11,661 | NASA Platinum Rewards 1,883 | AA Advantage 1,744 | Navy Federal Rewards 792 | Delta Sky Miles 175 | Virgin Atlantic Virgin Points 100 | Lowes Business Rewards 6,992 ($69.92) | Amazon Rewards 475 ($4.75) | Discover CB 499 ($4.99)
Message 8 of 16
iced
Valued Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?


@Citylights18 wrote:

The problem with the stocks and say crypto is that most buyers don't take a look at the macroeconomic cycle and just go all in thinking the more money they put in the more money they'll eventually make on it. I have a friend that went all in on Etherum when it was 3,500 in April and now its trading for half. He could have used that money to pay down a real estate loan and saved himself interest. Anytime you make an extra payment against a loan you are getting a return on that money equal to the interest saved.

 

Property number 1 for example costs you 200k but the DP was 5% first time homebuyer program (10,000) which has to be repaid in full to be able to sell. The buyer then spends two years paying off the homebuyer grant. The property has appreciated to 220,000 and they have 10,000 more in equity (owe 180k on a 220k) property. Then they could take a HELOC on the first property for 25,000 and use it as a DP for a 300,000 dollar property while renting out the first home.

 

After five years the first property has appreciated to 245,000 and the mortgage is down to 165,000. Then at their second property its appreciated to 325,000 and they owe 250,000 with the HELOC on property 1 paid. Before age 30 a buyer could have over 150,000 in equity just with picking up a couple of lower priced properties. 

 

Real estate if anything becomes a time in market thing. If you get started early it will help you later in life.


It looks like you're doing a bit of cherry picking mixed with examples of people not diversifying. You can also find people who went all-in on real estate and got burned as housing also has cycles. Your nest eggs should never all go into a single basket. When you pull back and look at your investments over a time scale in the decades (as you should), the adage that the more you put in increases what you get back does hold true.

 

Here's one of the oldest positions in my portfolio:

Screen Shot 2022-06-10 at 11.00.01 AM.png

Since 1982, there was the 1987 crash, the dotcom bubble burst, the recession in 08-11, and it's now down over 20% from its high last year, and despite all of that it's still up over 86,000% over 40 years. Had that been $9k instead of $9 invested, that position alone would be worth almost $8 million even in the current craptastic market. Stocks win when left to grow for long periods of time. Crypto's a different animal, but I've made my thoughts on it clear enough in other threads.

 

Again, I'm not saying you can't make money in RE (people do it every day), but I think you're looking at it from one angle and stocks from another, giving both a bit of an unfair assessment. Using your example above, things to consider:

 

- On the first property, you're in $10k (down payment) + $190k (mortgage at let's say 4%, so also $15k in interest over two years) + let's say $3k in property tax over those first two years you repay. Assuming $0 in maintenance (and this is being very generous as  you will almost certainly have to do some before renting it out, even if it's just paint or new carpet), you're in ~$210k ($28k plus still owe ~$182k on the mortgage) on the $220k home, even though your equity on paper is $30k.

 

- You then borrow $25k against that $30k to roll into a $300k property so now you're talking another $275k mortgage at 4% plus property taxes. You're the proud owner of $520k in real estate, of which only just a little under $10k isn't owed to someone else. That's about 2% of wiggle room, and if housing goes flat or even down in an overheated market, or you have extra unplanned maintenance to deal with, that $10k can be wiped out fast. There's also the risk that you're leveraged up to your eyeballs, and any difficultly to retaining occupancy can wipe out your cash flow (which you are relying on to make those debt payments).

 

That last sentence is important and worth emphasizing in a comparison between RE and equity investing. Assuming you stay out of margin investing and stick to traditional long-position style investing (ie, don't play with options and shorting stocks), you could put $10k in and see it drop to $5k when you need to pull it out for whatever reason, and you're out $5k and that's the end of it. If your tenants fall through in the leveraged RE game, you now have no cash coming in from rentals plus 3 loans (2 mortgages and a HELOC) coming knocking on your door for their money that you aren't generating. Foreclosures and auctions ensue, and what isn't recouped is going to be chased until you drop dead or ditch it in a bankrupcty.

 

It's great to think about the best-case outcomes to strive for, but also be aware of the worst-case depths you could also experience if things don't go right.

Message 9 of 16
wasCB14
Super Contributor

Re: Wealth Built on Housing Alone?

Speaking from my experience with a commercial apartment building in Los Angeles County...

 

A lot depends on where you live. If you have a bad tenant in a state or city where the laws and courts favor lenders over landlords (like CA) and tenants over landlords (like NYC), you could be in for a lot of pain if you rely heavily on debt.

 

It can also take a significant amount of time and effort to learn all applicable housing regulations, as well as to find good contractors. And even then, you're subject to those contractors being able to retain good employees. A lot of good electricians and plumbers retired during the pandemic, and with low unemployment employees know that as long as they quarter-ass it they won't get fired. An electrical contract that should have taken three or four days ended up taking four months. The effort in building and maintaining a good network of contractors takes some degree of scale to pay off, and getting more properties will take a long time if you don't have a lot of equity.

Personal spend: Amex Gold, Amex Schwab Plat., BofA PR+CCR(x2), Costco
Business use: Amex Bus. Plat., BBP, Lowes Amex AU, CFU AU
Perks: Delta Plat., United Explorer, IHG49, Hyatt, "Old SPG"
Mostly SD: Freedom Flex, Freedom, Arrival
Upgrade/Downgrade games: ED, BCE
SUB chasing: AA Platinum Select
Message 10 of 16
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.