No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
The debt collector received a copy of the dispute from EQ.
They are thus required to investigate and respond back to EQ, and EQ is then requried to complete their reinvestigation of the dispute of the acccuracy of the reported collections in their files.
However, nothing precludes the debt collector from choosing to voluntarily delete the disputed information from other CRAs that are not involved in the dispute. Deletion with other CRAs is not per se evidence that the debt collection has determined the information to be inaccurate or unverifiable, it is only evidence that they chose to voluntarily delete their voluntary reporting to that other CRA.
It is not uncommon for a dispute that is filed with one CRA to result in furnisher update or cancellation of their reporting with other CRAs.
EQ is still required to complete their reinvestigation no later than 30 days from the date of your dispute, an send you its formal Notice of Results of Reinvestigation within 5 business days thereafter.
That will then provide you their determination of whether the debt collector verified or whether the dispute resulted in correction or deletion by the CRA.
It is only that Notice that constitutes the outcome of your dispute with EQ, and not what the furnisher may have voluntarily chosen to also report to other CRAs.
Possibly.
You should soon have the required Notice of Results of Reivestigation from EQ, which should answer your question regarding their finding on the dispute filed with them. I would wait for that finding before speculating on why they may have chosen to delete with other CRAs, or whether the have found the dispute to be unverifiable or have made corrections.