No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I'm curious...everyone says that utilization is the key ingredient in FICO scores. If that's the case though, is it possible to constantly increase the size of your available credit by simply getting and not spending anything on them? Is spend a factor in your FICO score at all? You often see statements like "CREDIT CARD AMT IN HIGH CREDIT IS CREDIT LIMIT" on credit reports, which means that they effectively are not reporting your spend at all - just your credit limit and current balance, which would always be $0 if you don't use it. Do some banks report high balance instead of credit limit? I would think that if they reported high balance, if you weren't using your card at all, that account would be of little value to your credit. Also, if you barely use your credit cards, will individual issuers for your existing cards approve CLIs?
It seems silly that the path to building a massive credit portfolio would be to simply not use your credit cards. I have to be missing something here.
Hight utilization if reported does hurt your scores. The best is to keep the reported balance down below 8.9% for the best result. Fico does not care or even know how much you use your card, it just knows what the CC issuer reports. This normally happens a few days after the statement cut.
AS far as CLI's that is lender specific, but most do not grant CLI's if you are not using your card. Why would they take any more risk if you are not making the money in swipe fees.
You can use your cards and charge them up to the max as long as you don't let that high utilization report. Many people do this all the time when they have low limit cards.
Ok, so my question was really whether or not you could essentially just get a bunch of cards and not spend on them at all, and keep getting new cards with higher limits since you have no utilization and a "perfect" payment history. So the answer to that question then is yes? Since new banks won't know how much you used/didn't use the old cards, presumably they'd just see your perfect credit, and you could just go step by step up the ladder to higher credit limits.
Is that understanding correct?
Having more cards does not necessarily equate to perfect credit. The number of cards is irrelevant. 3 is the number most recommend around here so you can practice AZEO( all zero except one). This will give you a few points extra. That is where you let one card report a small balance < 8.9% and the rest report 0. In my opinion, more cards are just more to handle and that can cause you issues if you forgot to pay one on time.
I personally only want enough credit to meet my needs and don't see the need for a lot of cards. I just work on growing the CL of the ones I use. If you don't use a card every few months then a lot of creditors will just close the credit line for non-use.
It up to you, but make sure you have at least the minimum payment set up on an auto draft so you don't miss a payment.
Good advice from dynamic. When they say utilization (UTL) it means what reports as a balance when the statement cuts. Not using a card at all will just get it closed down if you don't use it once a quarter, usually. Using too much & not having it paid off by when the statement cuts (different from the payment due date) will ding you as well, but the good thing is that if you pay it off, the next time it reports your score can jump back up. FICO has no memory; it's a snapshot of your credit profile at a certain point in time. IMHO better to have a higher balance that you can easily pay off than run the risk of having accounts closed for non-use.
>
Yes. Look at your annual credit reports. Each month shows what was placed on the card and what the statement balance was. Remember that whoever pulls your credit can see this and a whole lot more. Ever had a financial guy let you see your report they got?