No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
llecs wrote:
The Boatley case never addressed whether reporting during the DV period was considered collection activity or not. Boatley was looking for a judgment in her favor by bringing up that issue. However the judge never did rule on that point because the Defendant (the CA) never offered proof that they sent a dunning letter to begin with. If they had, the judge would have to rule on that issue. Moreover, the central issue was whether or not a CA should mark the account as "in dispute" as they should have done.
sidewinder wrote:
llecs wrote:
I'll change my tune if it specifically addresses this issue. Is it on any of the letters in this forum? How about in the above opinion letter?
HappyDays wrote:
Please don't make me go digging this out. It was a JUDGE that said that reporting was concidered COLLECTION activity!!!!
I just re-read the follow up DV and it does say it in there. States "In the case TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 03-0762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity."Yes, it is on the opinion letter.
I commented on this case in here:
Sent you a PM with the link. No, didn't post on that but it sounds like a good read to see the take on a CA's perspective.
sidewinder wrote:llecs-- Can you PM the link? I wouldn't mind reading over the case. I read on a previous post where a forum member actually used this case in writing to the CA and the CA challenged it's validity. Was that you? Can't remember.
Yes, that was it.
llecs wrote:Sidewinder, was it this: