A so-called "method of verification" (MOV) request is provided for under FCRA 611(a)(6)(B)(iii).
It mandates that, upon request from a consumer, a CRA must provide "a description of the procedure used to determine the accuracy and completeness of the (disputed) information."
It is a procedural for a statement of the method used to determine the accuracy, which under the FCRA requires that they must refer a copy to the party who reported ("furnished") the disputed information to the CRA for their investigation and response back to the CRA.
Pertinent case law interpretation is that an MOV request does not involve any requirment to factually document the basis for their decision, and thus is not a requirement to "prove" the substance of their notice of results of their reinvestigation procedure.
What you are likely to receive is only a statement that they referred the dispute to party A, who responded back to the CRA with a verification of accuracy of the information that was reported by them.
As for multiple disputes, if a subsequent dispute is substantially the same as a prior dispute, the CRA can dismiss it as "frivolous or irrelevant" with no need for a new or subsequent reinvestigation of the same matter. One issue, one dispute.
If, after receivng the results of a CRA dispute, the consumer disagrees with the results, the consumer then has the right to file a civil action contesting the reasonableness of the investigation of the dispute, and thus get a review of the facts by the courts. See FCRA 623(c).
There is no formal appeal of the admin decision of a CRA dispute, and an MOV request only provides for CRA procedural disclosure, and not substance or proofs.
