No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
If the debt is legit and you wish to discharge it, then communicating with them may result in more favorable terms, such as a settlement or PFD.
If one is good at negotiations and wishes to secure the best terms, a phone call could be the very best step.
However, the cautions to never admit to the debt or make any partial payments unless sure you can make them all are very sound, as you dont want to risk setting a renewed SOL>
@Sbrooks1 wrote:
No voicemail but when call back get the Above
Miller Stark & Klein and Associates are debt collectors.
What happens when you apply for a mortgage is that inquiry triggers a notification to debt collectors that are subscribed to that service through the CRA's.
They know they stand a better chance of collecting if you are going for a mortgage - on some accounts, but not all. They may tell you that they have to be paid in order for you to get a mortgage - DON'T LISTEN TO THEM. The only person that can legitimately tell you that is the underwriter and/or LO at your lender. Sometimes (many times) paying very old debt will drop your score.
Don't panic. The CA's will say anything to get a payment from you - even if the debt is not legitimate. Not legitimate means a few things: already paid or doesn't belong to you at all or something else. Don't let them get under your skin. Check with your LO before you do anything.
I was not aware that the CRAs had a policy permitting debt collectors to obtain a credit report whenever a consumer's credit report added an inquiry by another party, such as a mortgage lendor.
If they do in fact have such a policy, it would seem to violate the permissible purpose requirment of FCRA 604, which requires that any party must provide a statement of current permissible purpose before they can obtain a credit report.
Yes, a debt collector, if they currently have collection authority, can request a credit report.
However, collection authority is not perpetual, and I question the ability of the CRA to assume continued permissible purpose by a debt collector whenever another party makes an inquiry for a credit report on a given consumer. They are not entitled to know the content of a consumer file without FIRST showing current permisible purpose.
Is there any public statement by the CRAs of such a policy?