No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I made a mistake not too long ago of disputing a repo account online right before I joined this forum. I'm concerned that I have woken the dog and it's going to bite. My credit report does not have a collections from the OC but the OC updated the account to show last activity date as 4/2007. I called the OC to find out what is going on and before I knew it, they transferred me to their collections department. I didn't know at the time I was talking to a CA rep and she was getting my info...address, phone #..etc etc. She then informed me that she will have to play a recorded message and that's when I realized it was a CA. The message informed me that if I don't dispute the letter then they will consider it valid.
So, I got worried and called the OC again to find out when was my DOFD and according to the rep, the last payment I made was in 10/2004. However, when I called all 3 credit bureaus, there is a variation of DOFD.
EX = dofd = 11/2003
EQ = dofd = 10/2003
TU = dofd = 08/2004
I'm worried the CA will start reporting to the credit bureaus and try to sue me since it looks like it's within the SOL?. My question is:
Is the last payment to the OC the DOFD or the date CRA is reporting?
A lesson learned and hope others will learn from this mistake.
Thanks
One more thing. Did they re-age the account? This is what's showing in my report from myfico.com
Citifinancial Auto
Status as of Mar, 2007
Date opened Nov, 2002
Date of last activity Mar, 2007
Date paid out Not Reported
Date closed Mar, 2007
Since I inadvertantly spoke with a CA rep, I probably will see their CA account on my report soon?
The SOL for written contract is 15 years. ![]()
ficonewbie01 wrote:The SOL for written contract is 15 years.
![]()
Ouch. The answer would likely be no, but maybe the debt could be argued as a promissory debt, rather than written. Is promissory sooner than written? In any case, I would start saving for the worse-case scenario.
ficonewbie01 wrote:Since I inadvertantly spoke with a CA rep, I probably will see their CA account on my report soon?
Maybe. Maybe not. If the OC is still reporting a balance, then you won't see the CA anytime soon. Also if the OC still owns the debt, some OC-CA agreements prohibit the CA from reporting. If the CA owns the debt, then there's a good chance, but not always so.
@llecs wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:The SOL for written contract is 15 years.
Ouch. The answer would likely be no, but maybe the debt could be argued as a promissory debt, rather than written. Is promissory sooner than written? In any case, I would start saving for the worse-case scenario.
@Anonymous wrote:Since I inadvertantly spoke with a CA rep, I probably will see their CA account on my report soon?
Maybe. Maybe not. If the OC is still reporting a balance, then you won't see the CA anytime soon. Also if the OC still owns the debt, some OC-CA agreements prohibit the CA from reporting. If the CA owns the debt, then there's a good chance, but not always so.
The promissory debt is no better. It's 15 years too...LOL
The OC has written a charge/off for the debt and the CA owns it.
It sounds like in this scenerio, it is best to make payment arrangement with the CA to prevent a judgment showing on the report. Of course after I send a DV letter to them when and if they do send me a dunning letter or start reporting to the credit bureaus.
Thanks llecs. I appreciate your advice. Unforunately, I never had online account with them.
What are the chances of a lawsuit from a CA if they are not in the same state as you?