Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

New Contributor

TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

I have gone round and round with MBB (Medical Business Bureau) about a paid $60 account that went into collections around the same time I paid it off with the OC.

They absolutely refuse to delete. After GW letters and phone calls, I finally just disputed it with all 3 CB's hoping for a deletion. I was totally giddy when TU and EX

came back and deleted the account, but EQ came back as verified. Ughhh....has anyone else had this happen? and if so, any advice?? TIA!

Starting Score: EQ 546 EX 560 TU 568
Current Score: EQ 703 EX 718 TU 715
Goal Score: 750

Take the FICO Fitness Challenge

Message 1 of 7
Valued Contributor

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

Yep, literally just happened with me except EX didn't delete. I plan on doing a direct, written dispute with EX. This is not surprising or rare.  Unfortunately you can't uses one bureaus listing/deletion as a basis for deletion from another. 

  • Current: EQ FICO 706, TU FICO 701, EX FICO 706 | Starting Score: 525 (05/2012)
  • Starting total revolving credit: $1100 | Current total revolving credit: $36,700
  • Inquiries (12 Months): EQ 2 TU 1 EX 1 | Most Recent: 1/21/2014
Chase Freedom $9500
DCU Visa $10000
Capital One QS $2000
AMEX BCE $3000
Lowe's CC $8500
WalMart CC $3100
BOA Platinum $600
Message 2 of 7
Moderator Emeritus

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

+1  There always seems to be a hold out, and it differs to each person.  Mine is EX that seems to hold on to thing forever.

Starting Score: 504
July 2013 score:
EQ FICO 819, TU08 778, EX "806 lender pull 07/26/2013
Goal Score: All Scores 760+, Newest goal 800+
Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

Current scores after adding $81K in CLs and 2 new cars since July 2013
EQ:809 TU 777 EX 790 Now it's just garden time!

June 2017 update: All scores over 820, just pure gardening now.
Message 3 of 7
Frequent Contributor

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

EQ is the new EX/.  I have just now tried to get a derog comment off a "good" account and they refused twice.


Lets see what the State Attorney General's office has to say.


Message 4 of 7
Established Contributor

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

I've noticed that some just won't let go, it almost seems as if they enforce no deletion more than the creditors do. The good news is, most of the things I want in life pull TU, so as long as they are good to me I'll be ok lol.

Starting Score: EQ: 383 2/2011
Current Score: TU: 644 EQ: 648 EX: 6?? 2/2015
Goal Score: 700

Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Message 5 of 7
Regular Contributor

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

EQ is the devil's personal CRA. They are by far the worst to deal with. Least in my experience. I am currently fighting with them.

I had a CO from Wells Fargo removed that alone took me months. Finally Wells gave in and realized they were wrong. They sent me a letter saying the TL would be deleted. Before I even received the letter EX and TU deleted. This was on Oct 15th. I called EQ last week and asked what the deal was. They asked if I wanted to dispute. So I said yes and faxed the letter over to them clearly saying that the TL was to be deleted. Results came back in 24hrs. Surprise verified! Actually not really a surprise from them. So I called and spoke with a supervisor and they claim that Wells Fargo sent the info back it was verified.

So once again I called Wells and they said they requested it to be removed. Called EQ back and they said Wells would have to call their 1 800 business number and tell them to remove it. EQ said their process is different then EX and TU and someone has to actually call them to remove information. I was not buying it.

So last week I had enough of it. Filed a complaint with the CFPB and shall see if this gets me anywhere.

Message 6 of 7
Community Leader
Legendary Contributor

Re: TU & EX deleted, why not EQ?

I see two sides to the coin.

It can be argued that they are not compelled to verify with each CRA, and thus may choose to only provide verification to only one.  Lacking verification from the furnisher and any other means to independently verify, the CRA is required to then delete the dispute information.  Howver, such deletion is not absolute, as they can always provide later submission of verification and have the deleted information reinserted.  Thus, lack of verification within the dispute period cannot be assumed as establishing that the information cannot be verified, just that it was not in that particular instance.


It can also be argued that, based on their requirement to report the results of any dispute to each CRA, and not just the one handling the dispute, if they were unable to verify, it would seem that consistency would result in the same reporting. 


I boils down, at least in my opinion, as to whether the furnisher actually provided verification back to the CRA.

You can request a description of the procedure used by the CRA to verify the accuracy by sending them a so-called MOV request.

That would be my recommended step.  The facts arent clear, at least to me, as to what was or was not communicated to each CRA.

Message 7 of 7