Hi,
I've been reading old threads here, and I have a question:
I have 3 Cap One accounts that fell +180 days late in 2004. They agreed to a repayment plan I set up through a CCCS, and I eventually paid them all in full. They were never turned over to a CA, always dealt direct with Cap One even though one lists as paid/charge off. Although they now all show $0 balance, pays as agreed, they still show 50> +180 day lates.
I was going to GW them, but from my past experience with them, and from previous posts here, I don't think they'll be receptive. One previous poster suggested disputing old lates, because the OC's won't bother to validate and will just drop off. I don't need the credit history, I have older (and better) history on my account.
Which is better: gw'ing, or disputing?
Thanks!
*********ooops, meant to say disputing old PAID lates!*************
Message Edited by BIRDWRITER on
07-30-2008 01:28 PM