cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

What would you change?

tag
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@Vinjints wrote:

@NoHardLimits wrote:
...  I occasionally let a large balance report on an account to show real usage to all my other creditors and then make sure that it reports as zero on the next statement to prove that I am a transactor rather than a revolver.  

 


Is this a real thing? Doesn't appear like it would affect scores, but does it actually have a positive affect on perception by other lenders?  


The only thing that could affect scores would be if the large balance exceeded 29% utilization on the account or 9% in aggregate.  Regarding the behavior by other creditors, there is anecdotal evidence about lenders denying new applications or credit limit increases due to the borrower already having too much unused existing credit.  If actual usage and payment information posted for all to see, things would be much more transparent.

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 11 of 24
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@SRT4kid93 wrote:

You know it's funny.

 

i look at my annual credit report. And for some reason all my accounts show last paid $0 so it constantly looks like I'm not paying anything towards my cards. 

mu only card that didn't do this was my old credit one card. Which actually combined all the payments I made through out the month. So if I made 4 $500 payments it would say "last paid $2000"

 

im not sure why this happens? But this should be addressed. 


I would prefer having the data show "last paid $2000" because that is actually what was paid during the reported statement cycle.

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 12 of 24
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@dfwxjer wrote:

The idea is to have ample credit where you can allow your monthly spending to report without exceeding 9% of your available credit. Paying off balances before the statement cuts is really only useful to manipulate reported utilization for specific scenarios. 

 

 


Number of accounts with balances is a metric which is affected by paying off balances before statement cuts.  Individual account utilization over 29% is also considered.  Total nominal balance thresholds also seem to affect some FICO models more than others.  VantageScore3 is definitely impacted by total balances independent of utilization %.  I realize that this forum deals with FICO scoring, but VantageScore4 will be incorporated into mortgage lending decisions.

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 13 of 24
SRT4kid93
Established Contributor

Re: What would you change?

@NoHardLimits 

 

Exactly!

 

combining all the payments made is the best way to go. I can't understand why chase, Amex, and capital one all report $0 as my last payment. I know chase re reports when paying down to $0, so technically the most recent report would show I have a $0 balance. But if my last payment was $2000 and I paid ir down to $0, it still should say my last payment was $2000.

Blue Cash PreferredGold CardSavor



Message 14 of 24
dfwxjer
Established Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@NoHardLimits wrote:

@dfwxjer wrote:

The idea is to have ample credit where you can allow your monthly spending to report without exceeding 9% of your available credit. Paying off balances before the statement cuts is really only useful to manipulate reported utilization for specific scenarios. 

 

 


Number of accounts with balances is a metric which is affected by paying off balances before statement cuts.  Individual account utilization over 29% is also considered.  Total nominal balance thresholds also seem to affect some FICO models more than others.  VantageScore3 is definitely impacted by total balances independent of utilization %.  I realize that this forum deals with FICO scoring, but VantageScore4 will be incorporated into mortgage lending decisions.


I let all of my cards, aside from the BCE, report whatever balance I use on the card each month, and my scores are all 800+. It doesn't seem like this metric has much weight to it, but I'm sure it's helped by no individual card getting anywhere above 9% at any given time. Aggregate util is never above 2%. 

 

I get there are situations where one might need that extra score bump, but I'll stick to my principle that it's best to have enough available credit where one doesn't need to worry about balances reporting of their BAU spending. If VantageScore4 is heavily affected by this then I'll be sure to just run all my spend through a single card for a month or two to manipulate the score that way lol. I'll let my MLO let me know what banks are wanting to see when we buy our next investment property but I've never had trouble in the past. 

 

All of my cards are set to autopay the statement balance. Having to go in and manually keep track of paying off balances before the statement cuts sounds like a giant hassle that I don't have time for. 

Current active cards:
Amex - Platinum, BCP
BofA - Unlimited Cash Rewards Sig
Chase - CSR, Amazon Prime
Citi - Custom Cash, Costco Visa
TCL - $315k
CC utili - 2%
Experian - 805
Message 15 of 24
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@SRT4kid93 wrote:

@NoHardLimits 

 

Exactly!

 

combining all the payments made is the best way to go. I can't understand why chase, Amex, and capital one all report $0 as my last payment. I know chase re reports when paying down to $0, so technically the most recent report would show I have a $0 balance. But if my last payment was $2000 and I paid ir down to $0, it still should say my last payment was $2000.


It's not currently a requirement to show detailed payment information.  That omission leads to misleading stats about borrower behavior.

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 16 of 24
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@dfwxjer wrote:

@NoHardLimits wrote:

@dfwxjer wrote:

The idea is to have ample credit where you can allow your monthly spending to report without exceeding 9% of your available credit. Paying off balances before the statement cuts is really only useful to manipulate reported utilization for specific scenarios. 

 

 


Number of accounts with balances is a metric which is affected by paying off balances before statement cuts.  Individual account utilization over 29% is also considered.  Total nominal balance thresholds also seem to affect some FICO models more than others.  VantageScore3 is definitely impacted by total balances independent of utilization %.  I realize that this forum deals with FICO scoring, but VantageScore4 will be incorporated into mortgage lending decisions.


I let all of my cards, aside from the BCE, report whatever balance I use on the card each month, and my scores are all 800+. It doesn't seem like this metric has much weight to it, but I'm sure it's helped by no individual card getting anywhere above 9% at any given time. Aggregate util is never above 2%. 

 

I get there are situations where one might need that extra score bump, but I'll stick to my principle that it's best to have enough available credit where one doesn't need to worry about balances reporting of their BAU spending. If VantageScore4 is heavily affected by this then I'll be sure to just run all my spend through a single card for a month or two to manipulate the score that way lol. 

 

All of my cards are set to autopay the statement balance. Having to go in and manually keep track of paying off balances before the statement cuts sounds like a giant hassle that I don't have time for. 


I'll admit that your behavior is much more sane than mine is.  I tend to treat my credit score as a type of on-going competition, as in what can I do to eke out another point or two?  No matter what, my scores are also 800+.

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 17 of 24
Patient957
Established Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@Thomas_Thumb wrote:

The CC issuers could report monthly payment activity as well as statement balance.

 


But they do.

 

For example:

1747851810376.png

 

You can see that even while my balance was reporting zero for many consecutive months, the actual non-zero payments were also reported.

 

This is similar for all my revolving accounts, across many issuers, including Synch and Cap One.

 

Edit to add:  This is my EQ from ACR dot com.

Message 18 of 24
dfwxjer
Established Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@NoHardLimits wrote:

@dfwxjer wrote:

@NoHardLimits wrote:

@dfwxjer wrote:

The idea is to have ample credit where you can allow your monthly spending to report without exceeding 9% of your available credit. Paying off balances before the statement cuts is really only useful to manipulate reported utilization for specific scenarios. 

 

 


Number of accounts with balances is a metric which is affected by paying off balances before statement cuts.  Individual account utilization over 29% is also considered.  Total nominal balance thresholds also seem to affect some FICO models more than others.  VantageScore3 is definitely impacted by total balances independent of utilization %.  I realize that this forum deals with FICO scoring, but VantageScore4 will be incorporated into mortgage lending decisions.


I let all of my cards, aside from the BCE, report whatever balance I use on the card each month, and my scores are all 800+. It doesn't seem like this metric has much weight to it, but I'm sure it's helped by no individual card getting anywhere above 9% at any given time. Aggregate util is never above 2%. 

 

I get there are situations where one might need that extra score bump, but I'll stick to my principle that it's best to have enough available credit where one doesn't need to worry about balances reporting of their BAU spending. If VantageScore4 is heavily affected by this then I'll be sure to just run all my spend through a single card for a month or two to manipulate the score that way lol. 

 

All of my cards are set to autopay the statement balance. Having to go in and manually keep track of paying off balances before the statement cuts sounds like a giant hassle that I don't have time for. 


I'll admit that your behavior is much more sane than mine is.  I tend to treat my credit score as a type of on-going competition, as in what can I do to eke out another point or two?  No matter what, my scores are also 800+.


I hear you and can thankfully say that I gave up score chasing 850 a long time ago! 

 

I've found that the only lenders that really care about whether a balance is revolving or not are mortgage lenders, and they review bank statements to verify what's being paid each month. They can quickly identify if a balance is the normal monthly spending that's PIF'd or if it's a revolving balance that's accumulated. 

Current active cards:
Amex - Platinum, BCP
BofA - Unlimited Cash Rewards Sig
Chase - CSR, Amazon Prime
Citi - Custom Cash, Costco Visa
TCL - $315k
CC utili - 2%
Experian - 805
Message 19 of 24
NoHardLimits
Valued Contributor

Re: What would you change?


@Patient957 wrote:

@Thomas_Thumb wrote:

The CC issuers could report monthly payment activity as well as statement balance.

 


But they do.

 

For example:

1747851810376.png

 

You can see that even while my balance was reporting zero for many consecutive months, the actual non-zero payments were also reported.

 

This is similar for all my revolving accounts, across many issuers, including Synch and Cap One.

 

Edit to add:  This is my EQ from ACR dot com.


I just checked my ACR reports.  As described earlier, lenders are not required to report payment info though some choose to do so.  For the lenders on my reports, the detailed payment reporting status is as follows:

 

Reports monthly payment details -

Navy Federal

US Bank

Wells Fargo

 

Does not report monthly payment details -

American Express

Capital One

Citibank

Discover

JP Morgan Chase

 

November 2025 Scorecard: Clean, Thick, Mature, New Revolver
FICO8:
FICO9:
VantageScore3:
Inquiries (n/12, n/24):
AAoA: 11 yrs | AoORA: 38 yrs | AoYRA: less than 1 yr | New Accounts: 1/6, 2/12, 3/24 | Util: 1% | DTI: 1%
Message 20 of 24
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.