No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I have 10 cards. 3 are reporting balances and I plan to keep these 3 balances for a while bc of 0%. Will I hurt my score if I report a balance on 1 additional card, bringing the total to 4 cards reporting a balance?
Here's a good example. Let's say that all of my 10 CL are $1000 each.
Month 1, I let 3 cards report a bal of $80 each. Total util would be 2.4%
Month 2, the only other change is that I let 4 cards report a bal of $60 each. Total util is still 2.4%
In this example, the only thing that changed is lower util on 3 cards that were originally at $80, and the additional card now reporting a balance.
@cr101 wrote:I have 10 cards. 3 are reporting balances and I plan to keep these 3 balances for a while bc of 0%. Will I hurt my score if I report a balance on 1 additional card, bringing the total to 4 cards reporting a balance?
Here's a good example. Let's say that all of my 10 CL are $1000 each.
Month 1, I let 3 cards report a bal of $80 each. Total util would be 2.4%
Month 2, the only other change is that I let 4 cards report a bal of $60 each. Total util is still 2.4%
In this example, the only thing that changed is lower util on 3 cards that were originally at $80, and the additional card now reporting a balance.
1. To answer the question in your headline, yes, the number of cards with a balance does affect the mortgage scores.
2. I don't know the answer to your 2nd question, whether going from 3/10 to 4/10 would move your scores.
@Anonymous wrote:
Yes it would most likely result in a small penalty, but it’s so small it’s insignificant most likely.
In my profile I had the experience of EX FICO 2 swinging up and down by 11 points each time I toggled between 12 accounts with balance and 13 accounts with balance. If I'm not mistaken it might have had to do with crossing a 40% threshold. I don't know if I ever pinned it down, but whatever it was, it wasn't insignificant.
TBH, The number of points gained or lost is going to be scorecard and profile dependent.
I have found a lower thresholds give more than the 33% or 40% threshold. For us really to give an educated guess you would need to give us your profile specifics.
Edit: higher risk profiles will lose and gain more where lower risk profiles will lose and gain less.
2d Edit and correction of 1st edit: additionally, it will have a bigger effect on the mortgage scores as SJ said, whereas on fico 8 it will probably cause a small penalty which is what I was referring to in my earlier post.
I mistakenly said gain more when I meant gain less referring to lower risk profiles in my first edit. It has been corrected.
@AllZero wrote:
For reference From AZ --> AZEO --> 100% w/balances data
I inadvertently tested this. My EXP score stayed the same. I went from 3/10 reporting a bal to 4/10 reporting a bal. The overall util only increased by $9. But, that pretty much answers my q about shifting overall bal between cards.
@cr101 wrote:
@AllZero wrote:
For reference From AZ --> AZEO --> 100% w/balances dataI inadvertently tested this. My EXP score stayed the same. I went from 3/10 reporting a bal to 4/10 reporting a bal. The overall util only increased by $9. But, that pretty much answers my q about shifting overall bal between cards.
@cr101 I'm guessing that was for EX8. Did you notice a change for EX2?