@Anonymous wrote:
That seems more reasonable. So in total I see myself having 4 new accounts in the next 12 months. Meaning a 200 point drop.
Sounds crazy.
No this will not happen but expect a drop of 30 to 65 pts when you are done, over all I expect mine will go down due to carrying 0% apr balances for 12 months and a new intstallment loan of $12,500, my UTI will go up which will drop my score. But my scores will go back up since i will be in the garden (not applying for credit for a allow) and making payments and UTI will slowly go down. Unsure if I will recover all my pts that dropped but I do expect to be back in the high 700s or maybe 800s in a year or so
@Anonymous wrote:
That seems more reasonable. So in total I see myself having 4 new accounts in the next 12 months. Meaning a 200 point drop.
Sounds crazy.
If one sees a 50 point drop from the opening of one account, they will not see a 200 point drop (50 x 4) if they open 4 accounts. They wouldn't even see that if they opened 10-15 accounts. Like many things credit-related, diminishing returns come into play. There is not a directly proportional relationship between number of accounts opened and score drop, so that's not something to ever worry about.
@Anonymous wrote:
Just like the other person told me. I should let credit card report balances as long as I do not exceed the utilization rate of maybe 9%.
Yes lower UTI is just one factor that helps with credit score, the lower the better. Good example here
FenderGuy, I actually think that's a very poor graphic and really misleading, as what is "spent" isn't relevant at all. $800 "spent" on a $4000 limit is no different than $800 "spent" on a $2000 limit. What matters is reported balance which of course yields utilization percentage.
One can spend (say) $16,000 on a $2000 limit card in a cycle if they make a $800 purchase every day and immediately pay it off 20 days in a row. Then at the end of the cycle they leave behind $100 to report, resulting in 5% utilization. I think too often people fall into thinking that they can only use [spend] less than (say) 30% of their credit limit to remain in a good place and confuse that with the amount that's reported on the account, when in terms of Fico scoring the reported balance is what matters.
@Anonymous wrote:FenderGuy, I actually think that's a very poor graphic and really misleading, as what is "spent" isn't relevant at all. $800 "spent" on a $4000 limit is no different than $800 "spent" on a $2000 limit. What matters is reported balance which of course yields utilization percentage.
One can spend (say) $16,000 on a $2000 limit card in a cycle if they make a $800 purchase every day and immediately pay it off 20 days in a row. Then at the end of the cycle they leave behind $100 to report, resulting in 5% utilization. I think too often people fall into thinking that they can only use [spend] less than (say) 30% of their credit limit to remain in a good place and confuse that with the amount that's reported on the account, when in terms of Fico scoring the reported balance is what matters.
This is just a simple example of UTI showing if one spent an AMT on the CL they have; what the UTI would be at the moment, dont over read.