cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FICO 9: 2 of 4 w/bal from 3 of 4 = TU +16, EQ +9

tag
Anonymous
Not applicable

FICO 9: 2 of 4 w/bal from 3 of 4 = TU +16, EQ +9

I have a total of 5 accounts on my file: 4 open revolving and 1 closed Share Secured Loan (SSL).

 

So this change in number of accounts reporting a balance could be one of:

  1. 3 of 4 (75%) to 2 of 4, (50%) (counting only open accts)
  2. 3 of 5 (60%) to 2 of 5, (40%) (counting open + closed acct)

I think it's #1, but I thought Birdman7 and Trudy might have found some evidence for #2.

 

"Too Many Accounts with Balances" moved down 1 spot in the list of reasons on all FICO 9 scores.

 

 

 8 

AU8

BC8

MTG

AUT

BKC

 9 

AU9

BC9

 3 

EQ

0

0

+3

 +3

+3

+2

+9

+14

+9

 

TU

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 +16

+16

+16

 

EX

 0

+2

-2

-2

-2

+1

+1

+1

+4

AoOA

AAoA

AoYA

 2yr 10mo

 1yr 7mo

8mo

AoORA

AAoRA

AoYRA

1yr 10mo

1yr 3mo

8mo

 AGGREGATE % 

 AGGREGATE $ 

 TOTAL LIMIT 

4% (4.48) [+1%]

 $1423 [+$314]

 $32,000

 

(Ignore the EX 2's -2 point drop:  2 of them are showing 'Not Using Revolving Accounts' with $1,423 in balances reporting. (Report Link)

They also show "Too many accounts with balances". lol Gonna find out later who to talk to about this obvious bug.

$1,234 of that is on a Citi Costco Anywhere Visa Signature card, and there is no way that card isn't counting on EX2 this month when it has for 21 months prior to this.)

1 REPLY 1
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: FICO 9: 2 of 4 w/bal from 3 of 4 = TU +16, EQ +9

That’s insane about the Costco
Message 2 of 2
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.