@Revelate Thanks for chiming in brother. Yes, actually I have a table of contents/index, I just haven't posted it yet. It will be a little easier to see the format and flow then.
Point well taken about the table I will move it up. I don't envy you on that ISO thing, gotta dot all your i's and cross all your t's!
I'll go back and try to define the acronyms and mention the acronym post Cassie graciously found and posted for the community.
I'll have to look at the helpful threads post, but that's why I reserved the placeholder posts, so I could expand it because we're going to add information already, I know.
The format was to go one by one through the five ingredients and examine each of the associated metrics for each sequentially. So the metrics and the derogatories both gotta be explained in their respective sections unless I restructure the entire thing, but a separate remediation section afterwards is be a great idea. Any help would be appreciated. 😉
Yes I explained and qualified it as clean segmentation, but I did not yet speak of dirty segmentation. I had thought about that and wanted to add another sentence or two to explain that, actually. Good minds think alike! From the literature, I see severity and recency. Any additional information on that would be great!
Yes I did mention a 30 day late remains in a clean card. But are you saying I'm incorrect that a certain number of 30 day lates will not banish you to a dirty card? Is my statement incorrect? If so please advise, so I can remove it.
Thank you very much for your time in reviewing this and offering your comments and insight. The community is grateful.
And I look forward to any constructive criticism from any member. If anyone sees any inaccuracies please let me know.
Goal Scores: 700 across all three
