cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785

tag
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785

Transunion, VS 3.0 via CK.

 

670 -> 785.

 

Oct 23 -> Nov 7 (yeah not as ideal as if I'd pulled 10/30).

 

Salient change: the 30 day late from 10/2015 aged over a year.  Couple other minor balance changes but nothing otherwise significant; no change in inquiry count either.

 

Still a tax lien and a 30/60 late from 2010 on the report, and it's back up to where the EQ and EX VS 3.0 scores are.




        
Message 1 of 5
4 REPLIES 4
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785

Perhaps the below curve for missed payments is an average for 30 day and 60 day lates with 30 day losing impact at 12 months and 60 day at 24 months.

VantageScore graphic.gif

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 2 of 5
Revelate
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785

Seems reasonable; it's probably even more complicated than that ( including more serious deliquencies potentially) as I can't see a 30+ having the same weight as a 90+ or a 120+ but the 30+ is absolutely more frequent than any of the others.

 

Not sure how much relevance it really has but it was an interesting datapoint on the aging of a 30 day late on Vantage at least and there isn't a whole lot else it could be since the tax lien is still very much there.  Does suggest that my 30 and even 60 from 2010 probably aren't hurting me at all Vantage wise and haven't for several years even given I've been 780-790 since CK switched from the TU New Accounts Score.




        
Message 3 of 5
dlm0820
Contributor

Re: Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785


@Revelate wrote:

Transunion, VS 3.0 via CK.

 

670 -> 785.

 

Oct 23 -> Nov 7 (yeah not as ideal as if I'd pulled 10/30).

 

Salient change: the 30 day late from 10/2015 aged over a year.  Couple other minor balance changes but nothing otherwise significant; no change in inquiry count either.

 

Still a tax lien and a 30/60 late from 2010 on the report, and it's back up to where the EQ and EX VS 3.0 scores are.


 

Useless.  Vantage increase or decrease means nothing.

 

Check FICO score and see what happened then report back for a useful datapoint.

Message 4 of 5
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Vantage 3.0 datapoint: 670 -> 785


@dlm0820 wrote:

Useless.  Vantage increase or decrease means nothing.

 

Check FICO score and see what happened then report back for a useful datapoint.


Poor attitude here. 

 

Of course it means something.  It's a scoring model that uses criteria and data to yield a number.  If the number changes, something caused it and the OP clearly stated in the thread title that this was a VS datapoint. 

Message 5 of 5
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.