No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:
@CassieCard I am definitely looking forward to it. But I do not expect any significant gains on the mortgage scores and if you do have any, then I would suspect it is scorecard dependent upon young or thin cards.
EX 2 down -22pts: 733 to 711!
I bet this doesn't happen with @creds profile when revolving credit history reaches 1 year, due to having more cards. I can't wait to see that result.
No worries. (Table of EX updates.)
@Revelate wrote:Surprisingly I'm still down 30 points in EX FICO 8 from my earlier high this year before I opened new accounts and I've been clean for over six months now... I think that score recovery has been vastly overstated for mature and generally stable files, and for newer files I strongly suspect the points are coming from other sources than the most recent account aging.
I'm beginning to think that my significant AoYA 3 and 6 month gains are coming from what I would call 'Average Age of Revolving Accounts'. This is equal to AoYA on my profile.
Every 3 months - 3/6/9 mo and just happened again at 12mo - I've seen 'Short revolving credit history' move down the list. Since there is also 'Short credit history', the algorithm has to be tracking revolving accounts separately from AoOA/AAoA/AoYA.
For profiles like yours and @Birdman7's, revolving account age will have a very low weighting, if it shows up as a reason at all.
@Anonymous wrote:
@Revelate wrote:Surprisingly I'm still down 30 points in EX FICO 8 from my earlier high this year before I opened new accounts and I've been clean for over six months now... I think that score recovery has been vastly overstated for mature and generally stable files, and for newer files I strongly suspect the points are coming from other sources than the most recent account aging.
I'm beginning to think that my significant AoYA 3 and 6 month gains are coming from what I would call 'Average Age of Revolving Accounts'. This is equal to AoYA on my profile.
Every 3 months - 3/6/9 mo and just happened again at 12mo - I've seen 'Short revolving credit history' move down the list. Since there is also 'Short credit history', the algorithm has to be tracking revolving accounts separately from AoOA/AAoA/AoYA.
For profiles like yours and @Birdman7's, revolving account age will have a very low weighting, if it shows up as a reason at all.
Well I actually see the short revolving credit history as a pretty consistent reason code on my files for the newer models.
As we discussed before I can't understand why my scores didn't move with the installment loans being added and then I got whacked on the two revolvers being added unless it's explicitly youngest revolver which makes some sense I suppose. I'm not sure if it's average age of revolvers or youngest age of revolvers... agreed it's not a major factor on mine as it's usually in the #3 or #4 slots TBH.
Sadly I don't get good FICO 8 reason codes now, though it's on both FICO 8 AU and BC but both sit behind the usual short credit history, new account, recently looking for credit. I have 2/4 inquiries turning one year tomorrow on Experian, we'll see if the recently looking for credit shifts below the revolving line.
Also just noticed something: that short revolving history reason code does show up on FICO 9 on the 60D late scorecard... and I'm pretty much 100% convinced that it doesn't on any derogatory scorecard prior to FICO 9. Serious deliquency tag still there so I don't think 60D lates suddenly became top 8 or whatever on FICO 9.
Huh another interesting one, short revolving history is the #1 reason code on a clean FICO 9 BC even above short account history. Don't really monitor FICO 9 at all nor the industry options specifically but it's interesting to see the relative weights of various things.

@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:well i just allowed 3 cards to report a balance, a very small tiny balance, but it caused all my fico2 based scores to drop about 20 points! it only caused my fico8 to drop by 1 point. so this is a very significant factor for the fico2. i wonder if the point penalty would have been less if only 2 cards reported a balance.
That's really interesting. My EX 2 will drop 6 points with 2/2 cards reporting a balance and yours drops ~20pts with 3/4.
@CassieCard Shows the difference it can make having more revolvers! ![]()
@Revelate wrote:In my experience EX FICO 2 (and FICO 98 model in general) isn't the same weighting as new accounts in the FICO 04 model (EQ FICO 5 / TU FICO 4 when we're talking mortgage scores).
I have the same accounts now between EX / EQ, same pattern of opening in the last year, etc ad nasuem. Both clean scorecards with some smattering of inquiries and identical new accounts.
EX FICO 2: New Accounts reason code = #4
EQ FICO 5: New accounts reason code = #1
For reference the order matters: the higher on the list the stronger effect on your resultant score. Actually I suspect new accounts is a scorecard segmentation device in EQ FICO 5, #1 anecdotally seems to be that in general on most files I've seen reason codes for, not sure if that admittedly holds in all FICO models but AAOA, PR, 60D+ late, and open accounts are all reason codes which sort to the top on EQ FICO 5. Surprisingly I'm still down 30 points in EX FICO 8 from my earlier high this year before I opened new accounts and I've been clean for over six months now... I think that score recovery has been vastly overstated for mature and generally stable files, and for newer files I strongly suspect the points are coming from other sources than the most recent account aging.
Admittedly both of my EQ/EX mortgage scores (when I have proper balances reporting) are around 780 or even slightly higher looking at the EQ one from last month; however, new accounts matter a lot more on the FICO 04 models for clean files than they do on EX FICO 2. Given that 2/3 of the mortgage scores are underwritten under said FICO 04 models, the recommendation if at all possible to stay scrupulously clean with regards to new accounts in a year is still optimal.
End of the day a mortgage is generally the most important financial decision in one's life: additional credit cards simply don't rate and frankly can wait if you've already established enough from a file thickness perspective.
Rev Sorry for the late reply, but wanted to mention a couple thoughts. First, take a look at my siggy. You can see the effects of 5 new revolvers reporting, 3 months later. I also had the new loan 2 months prior to the card opening dates. You may recall I discovered loans do NOT reset AoYA for at least version 8...That was while you were busy, but I think I messaged you the links, if not I can, for all the discoveries I made then.
To borrow your words: I have the same accounts now between EX / TU, same pattern of opening in the last year, etc ad nasuem. Both clean scorecards with some smattering of inquiries and identical new accounts. Only difference is mine is EX/TU. EQ has one old account that's closed its been holding onto since the 90's.
EX FICO 2: New Accounts reason code = Non-existent (only 3 codes, so not pushed off)
EX FICO 2: Recently Opened Too Many New Credit Accounts = #2
TU FICO 04: New Accounts reason code = #1
EQ FICO 5: New accounts reason code = #1
So that definitely supports your position new accounts cost more on FICO 04, even when its multiple accounts! While you were gone, I questioned whether AoYA as we know it for FICO 08 exists in earlier versions. I failed to see AoYA awards at 1 year really except Version 8. Strangely enough, FICO 9 took points from me! Check it:
So, also while you were gone, I came to question the source of these 3/6/9 month awards. Since we know "new accounts" is a segmentation factor in FICO 08, there should only be the one breakpoint (12 months) and one award, which plenty of data support. But, as you can see from my tightly-controlled data, 5-4-2 cared less about 12 months AoYA. Made me question whether AoYA is a segmenter in earlier versions.
Likewise, I came up with a theory for the source of the awards, though I may be wrong. I posited it came from 3, 6, and 9 months of revolver age without delinquency, Amounts Owed sector, possibly? But only for young or thin files..or maybe both? Definitely not for old thick files!
@Anonymous wrote:I'm beginning to think that my significant AoYA 3 and 6 month gains are coming from what I would call 'Average Age of Revolving Accounts'. This is equal to AoYA on my profile.
Every 3 months - 3/6/9 mo and just happened again at 12mo - I've seen 'Short revolving credit history' move down the list. Since there is also 'Short credit history', the algorithm has to be tracking revolving accounts separately from AoOA/AAoA/AoYA.
For profiles like yours and @Birdman7's, revolving account age will have a very low weighting, if it shows up as a reason at all.
Interesting. Keep in mind AoYA appears to be AoYRA (revolving), excluding installment accounts.
And no doubt the scorecard reassignment @ AoYA 12 months caused the EX2 drops. Look forward to the rest of the changes, assuming its a segmenter in FICO 98. I can thinkof no other reason for te drops though, all you did was add age right?
@Revelate wrote:As we discussed before I can't understand why my scores didn't move with the installment loans being added and then I got whacked on the two revolvers being added unless it's explicitly youngest revolver which makes some sense I suppose. I'm not sure if it's average age of revolvers or youngest age of revolvers... agreed it's not a major factor on mine as it's usually in the #3 or #4 slots TBH.
Yeah, I determined loans don't reset AoYA, so its AoYR, really. Yes, it's explicitly the youngest revolver, I believe.
i just checked my 3b reports again: my TU fico8 fell 15pts due to the 3 cards reporting a balance. but i gained +5 pts on experian!!? pretty weird. both are now almost exactly the same, 721 & 722. i'm pretty sure TU will bounce back again when i pay off the balances, the scores seem to remember where they were and bounce back.
today i was supposed to become scorable on eq, but my 3b report glitched. the entire eq report is missing.
i will have to check next week to see what it is, since i don't know anyone giving out free eq scores.
@Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Keep in mind AoYA appears to be AoYRA (revolving), excluding installment accounts.
And no doubt the scorecard reassignment @ AoYA 12 months caused the EX2 drops. Look forward to the rest of the changes, assuming its a segmenter in FICO 98. I can thinkof no other reason for te drops though, all you did was add age right?
Yes, just aging of 1 month - same exact balances as reported on my November 10 3B report. TU will go to zero scorable inquiries on Dec 20, followed by EX/EQ (Citi double-pull) on Dec 23. This will be a major boost across all 28 scores, since it was such a big hit last year. (My -20pts for an inq on EQ 8 is the highest drop I've never read about.)
I think the changes this month are due to AoOA reaching 2 years. See this post by @thornback, which references a few posts by @Thomas_thumb.