+1
Neither the DV process under the FDCPA nor the dispute process under the FCRA have judges to compel the production of all relevant evidency, or to review and decide upon the invevitable differences of opinion as to what any documentation does or does not prove. Both processes are based on the requiement that the party conduct a reasonable investigation, and provide the consumer with the results, not their suppoting documentation.
Compelling both parties to produce all relevant information and the authorty to make a binding decision on what is or correct is the job of the courts.
If you feel that, for any reason, the debt collector has not properly validated, then if your DV was timely, you consider them to still be under a cease collection bar.
Violation on their part would only occur at such a time that they resume collection on the debt without first having provided what you consider to be inadequate debt validation.
If their failure is clear from the facts, such as if they have provided nothing prior to resumption of collection, then you could file a complaint witht hte CFPB for clear violation of the FDCPA..
However, if they have provided what they consider to be adequate validation and you disagree, you need to get resolution by the courts through legal process.
Adequacy of their validation then becomes an issue for the judge.
just make sure that in your dv letter that you ask for the information above. if they respond it will be provided and you can go from there. does your daughter have any documents provided by sprint as to the end of her contract? being positive and having proof positive are two different things. alot of things may be admisble such as emails and what not. im not a guru so i don't know what all counts. but having something is a start.