No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Remedios wrote:
@Superduper2014 wrote:@HeavenOhio Good advise.
Let's say Amex wants a $300 minimum payment. What is the amount you should pay to apiece them if you want to pay the minimum possible during the promo?
Also, which other banks/lenders are sensitive to this off the top of your head.
Thanks
@Superduper2014 you cannot negotiate to appease them. Whatever amount they give you is what you need to pay. If you continue with minimum payments, Amex is going to do Amex things.
As far as which lender would allow you to make minimum payments while continuing to rack up balances, outside of the credit unions, I cannot think of any lender who is comfortable with the situation you're describing.
The only difference is that other lenders wont "negotiate" or re-open cards if they decide to close them.
If you use card for BT, or to take advantage of 0%, balance must go down, not up for a year.
I dont want to sound too preachy (moderately preachy is okay), but there is a lesson to be learned here.
I think OP is asking about going forward, after they pay what AMEX has asked, what amount they should be paying over the minimum to avoid the problem again.
@Anonymous wrote:
@Remedios wrote:
@Superduper2014 wrote:@HeavenOhio Good advise.
Let's say Amex wants a $300 minimum payment. What is the amount you should pay to apiece them if you want to pay the minimum possible during the promo?
Also, which other banks/lenders are sensitive to this off the top of your head.
Thanks
@Superduper2014 you cannot negotiate to appease them. Whatever amount they give you is what you need to pay. If you continue with minimum payments, Amex is going to do Amex things.
As far as which lender would allow you to make minimum payments while continuing to rack up balances, outside of the credit unions, I cannot think of any lender who is comfortable with the situation you're describing.
The only difference is that other lenders wont "negotiate" or re-open cards if they decide to close them.
If you use card for BT, or to take advantage of 0%, balance must go down, not up for a year.
I dont want to sound too preachy (moderately preachy is okay), but there is a lesson to be learned here.
I think OP is asking about going forward, after they pay what AMEX has asked, what amount they should be paying over the minimum to avoid the problem again.
All of it, given the history?
@Remedios wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
@Remedios wrote:
@Superduper2014 wrote:@HeavenOhio Good advise.
Let's say Amex wants a $300 minimum payment. What is the amount you should pay to apiece them if you want to pay the minimum possible during the promo?
Also, which other banks/lenders are sensitive to this off the top of your head.
Thanks
@Superduper2014 you cannot negotiate to appease them. Whatever amount they give you is what you need to pay. If you continue with minimum payments, Amex is going to do Amex things.
As far as which lender would allow you to make minimum payments while continuing to rack up balances, outside of the credit unions, I cannot think of any lender who is comfortable with the situation you're describing.
The only difference is that other lenders wont "negotiate" or re-open cards if they decide to close them.
If you use card for BT, or to take advantage of 0%, balance must go down, not up for a year.
I dont want to sound too preachy (moderately preachy is okay), but there is a lesson to be learned here.
I think OP is asking about going forward, after they pay what AMEX has asked, what amount they should be paying over the minimum to avoid the problem again.
All of it, given the history?
I don't really think that's necessary. AMEX doesn't expect to be paid in full right away, they just don't want to be holding the bag on a balance that isn't shrinking. 3X minimum seems to be commonly quoted as safe for AMEX. OP probably shouldn't be using the card if they're unable to pay off their new charges PLUS the 3X though.
Sorry for my horrible spelling of "Appease" (yikes)
Yes. this if for going forward.
Thanks guys for the insights!
Just heard on a local chicago station, that 50 mil. credit cards got their credit cards limits decreased last months.
@Anonymous wrote:Just heard on a local chicago station, that 50 mil. credit cards got their credit cards limits decreased last months.
Sigh, I am so sick of terrible data surveys.
CompareCards commissioned Qualtrics to conduct an online survey of 1,039 credit cardholders, with the sample base proportioned to represent the overall population. The survey was fielded April 22-24, 2020.
On their own site with the prominent LendingTree logo displayed. Yeah, people looking for more credit during this time, that's a sign of financial stability.
@Superduper2014 wrote:@HeavenOhio Good advise.
Let's say Amex wants a $300 minimum payment. What is the amount you should pay to appease them if you want to pay the minimum possible during the promo?
Also, which other banks/lenders are sensitive to this off the top of your head.
Thanks
Let's say you have a 12-month 0% APR balance transfer period. Divide the amount you transferred by 11 and pay that amount plus whatever charges you made for the month. That's your minimum payment each month. That way you'd have the balance paid off one month before the BT period ends.
@Anonymous wrote:I don't really think that's necessary. AMEX doesn't expect to be paid in full right away, they just don't want to be holding the bag on a balance that isn't shrinking. 3X minimum seems to be commonly quoted as safe for AMEX. OP probably shouldn't be using the card if they're unable to pay off their new charges PLUS the 3X though.
Agreed. My very first card with Amex, a revlover, had a 0% promo so I carried a balance to take advantage of it. I also made more than minimums and paid it off within 6 months rather than dragging it out a whole 12. So I've practiced both methods of PIF and balance carrying, and haven't ever recieved any type of AA from them.
I can't imagine what the balance would have to be for there to be a $300 minimum payments anyways, so that $300 should in most cases be the 3X minimum. MaizeandBlue offered up a very good BT strategy.
another note is that as much as 0% is awesome, you still have to pay it off
i never put more than 50% utilization on a BT offer/card - this way it is useful but will drop below 29% in a short period of time
also, if you BT to another card, then 11 months later to another BT card, it does keep your interest payments low/zero, but you do have to pay off the debt eventually - and i think the BT kind of hides this fact
in the OP's case i would pay the card down to 30% and then make bigger than min payments until it is gone
and i agree with the Don't Mix BT and regular spend - it causes convoluted interest strategies - better to keep them separate
@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:I don't really think that's necessary. AMEX doesn't expect to be paid in full right away, they just don't want to be holding the bag on a balance that isn't shrinking. 3X minimum seems to be commonly quoted as safe for AMEX. OP probably shouldn't be using the card if they're unable to pay off their new charges PLUS the 3X though.
Agreed. My very first card with Amex, a revlover, had a 0% promo so I carried a balance to take advantage of it. I also made more than minimums and paid it off within 6 months rather than dragging it out a whole 12. So I've practiced both methods of PIF and balance carrying, and haven't ever recieved any type of AA from them.
I can't imagine what the balance would have to be for there to be a $300 minimum payments anyways, so that $300 should in most cases be the 3X minimum. MaizeandBlue offered up a very good BT strategy.
In a previous thread, OP mentioned a $13k BT. Since Amex charges 1% of the intrest and balance, the card would have to be nearly maxed out to get close to $300. If the payment (I didn't read the thread) is at $300, there's probably some plan it payments involved because maxed out at 0%, is only $250.