cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

First card with no history except AU for 3 months?

tag
ksantangelo23
Frequent Contributor

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?

My first card under my name was BCP @ $5,600, thanks to my AU history.

 

Without any doubt, AU accounts are important. But, it is true that some lenders completley disregard them. (Chase).

AMEX Hilton Ascend: $55,000 | Chase Sapphire Reserve: $30,000 | PNC Points: $17,500 | AMEX BCE (AU): $18,000 | AMEX BCP: $15,000 | US Bank Cash+ $15,000 | AMEX Business Prime: $14,000 | AMEX SimplyCash: $12,000 | Capital One QS: $13,500 | Chase Business Ink: $12,000 | PNC Everyday (AU): $12,000 | JCPenny Store Card: $10,500 | Chase Slate: $9,400 | Capital One QS: $6,500 | (2nd) US Bank Cash+ (2nd): $7,500 | Discover IT: $6,000 | Chase Freedom: $3,500 | Auto Lease: $0/$21,000 | Auto Loan: $0/$18,000 |

TU: 818 EX: 809 EQ: 801

Message 11 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@ksantangelo23 wrote:

@Anonymous first card under my name was BCP @ $5,600, thanks to my AU history.

 

Without any doubt, AU accounts are important. But, it is true that some lenders completley disregard them. (Chase).


Very much agree...

Message 12 of 26
vanillabean
Valued Contributor

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


Yes-Its-Me Wrote:

 

 What I am disagreeing to in your post is "saying AU history doesn't matter" and my clarification is it does..


 

For the record, I didn't say "AU history doesn't matter." I said "AU history doesn't matter much." Smiley Surprised

 

Message 13 of 26
ksantangelo23
Frequent Contributor

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

Yes-Its-Me Wrote:

 

 What I am disagreeing to in your post is "saying AU history doesn't matter" and my clarification is it does..


 

For the record, I didn't say "AU history doesn't matter." I said "AU history doesn't matter much." Smiley Surprised

 


Made a world a difference for me Smiley Happy Im not familiar with any CC lender that "sort of" considers AU history. It seems to be they do, or they dont.

AMEX Hilton Ascend: $55,000 | Chase Sapphire Reserve: $30,000 | PNC Points: $17,500 | AMEX BCE (AU): $18,000 | AMEX BCP: $15,000 | US Bank Cash+ $15,000 | AMEX Business Prime: $14,000 | AMEX SimplyCash: $12,000 | Capital One QS: $13,500 | Chase Business Ink: $12,000 | PNC Everyday (AU): $12,000 | JCPenny Store Card: $10,500 | Chase Slate: $9,400 | Capital One QS: $6,500 | (2nd) US Bank Cash+ (2nd): $7,500 | Discover IT: $6,000 | Chase Freedom: $3,500 | Auto Lease: $0/$21,000 | Auto Loan: $0/$18,000 |

TU: 818 EX: 809 EQ: 801

Message 14 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

Yes-Its-Me Wrote:

 

 What I am disagreeing to in your post is "saying AU history doesn't matter" and my clarification is it does..


 

For the record, I didn't say "AU history doesn't matter." I said "AU history doesn't matter much." Smiley Surprised

 


Fair enough, my error for omitting the "much".  But I still think AU history does matter very much.... There are alot of people starting out who don't need a secure card to get started.  Being added as AU is enough to get them going and don't thing it is manipulation.

Message 15 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@ksantangelo23 wrote:

@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

Yes-Its-Me Wrote:

 

 What I am disagreeing to in your post is "saying AU history doesn't matter" and my clarification is it does..


 

For the record, I didn't say "AU history doesn't matter." I said "AU history doesn't matter much." Smiley Surprised

 


Made a world a difference for me Smiley Happy Im not familiar with any CC lender that "sort of" considers AU history. It seems to be they do, or they dont.


Agreed.  AU helps get people through the door....   

Message 16 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

Au history IS a big deal, some lenders more than others.

 

Did the lenders explicitly say so?

 


Some just said lack of credit history or too many new accounts is a problem.

 

Message 17 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

Yes-Its-Me Wrote:

 

 What I am disagreeing to in your post is "saying AU history doesn't matter" and my clarification is it does..


 

For the record, I didn't say "AU history doesn't matter." I said "AU history doesn't matter much." Smiley Surprised

 


Are the accounts you rolled over to her file only 3 months old? Your sisters file should show the opening date of the card (when YOU opened it).

 

What cards did you roll over, what are the limits, and when did you open them? Then we can tell you your best course of action.

 

This forum tells her what to do. It's time to just apply where others on this forum with a file similar to hers and build it up.

 

I got what I have with brand new accounts ooened 6/14 that I was an au on. That's why I want to know the specifics of your accounts. If they are several years old or older she can start really moving forward. She just needs to really get moving. 

 

Message 18 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?

My dw applied for amex with 4 months as an AU on two of my cards and got approved for not one but two amex ed and bce 9500 9900.... Letter received from amex after said she had 690....i say give it a shot if it gets approved keep applyingfor the cards she want and if it doesnt then just stop and see what else can she do....
Message 19 of 26
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: First card with no history except AU for 3 months?


@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

@Anonymous wrote:

@Anonymous-own-fico wrote:

AU history doesn't matter much, except maybe she can skip the initial step of a secured card. Try a credit union. She needs income! Does she have other credit such as installment loans? I assume her Chex is clean.

 


I have to disagree with this statement.  Authorize users are very important in helpting one establish credit history. To backup up what I am saying with a quick research and to validify, here is a quick from a valid source - Huffingtonpost

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/creditsesamecom/how-does-being-an-authori_b_5946054.html

 

I hope this clarifies things a bit for all...

 

 


 

I don't actually disagree with what Ulzheimer is saying here ( and I don't think I have ever disagreed with anything that he has said). But in the article it's almost all FICO 04 and very little lenders.


How about this article? "FICO's Watts cautions young adults that there is no quick fix to good credit and building a good credit history takes time. The point and purpose of adding someone (or of being added) to a credit card as an authorized user or co-signer should be access to credit, not manipulation of one's credit history or credit rating," according to Watts."

 

 


We're not trying to be goody goodys here. The point of piggybacking on credit cards as an au is to build a solid file for yourself as quick as possible, Period! Access to credit is bull unless you are married or in a relationship and whomever applies for a card adds their partner to it so that they both have access to each others cards.

Message 20 of 26
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.