No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
My first instance of having an AU was to add my now-wife to my Lowes card earlier this year. In that case, all the charges show up on my log in to the Sync Lowes account.
Adding her as an AU on my new Freedom Flex card, not sure how the charges she makes will be visible on my card? On my Chase log in? Also on hers?
What is your experience with Authorized Users, since often these seem to be outside the household? Are different banks handling the tracking of AU charges differently?
For Chase, there is no separate login for AUs, all the charges will be present in your account .
If you need to be able to separate them, you can add "memo" once the charge posts.
Tracking wise, not sure what it looks like on the backend, there is nothing different between mine and my daughter's card (I added her when the card was issued so everything but name is same).
It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
@Anonymalous wrote:It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
There isn't a single lender that doesn't show all transactions for primary cardholder.
Some, like Amex, will not show transactions to AUs that were made by primary cardholder.
@Anonymalous wrote:It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
Yes, but that is the crux of my question. If people give friends an AU card, what are some of the agreements these cardholders have with their AU? At the least it would seem a regular communication between the cardholder and AU would be necessary.
How do you keep separate, and yet coordinated, the arrangement that the AU needs to pay their charges? Does the cardholder statement distinguish the AU balance separately? School me .
@Remedios wrote:
@Anonymalous wrote:It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
There isn't a single lender that doesn't show all transactions for primary cardholder.
Some, like Amex, will not show transactions to AUs that were made by primary cardholder.
Does that mean some banks will let the AU see the primary cardholder charges? Or the AU only sees the overall utilization on the card to be aware when the limit is nearing?
Is AMEX allowing the primary cardholder to allocate a portion of the limit for the AU to see and utilize?
@NRB525 wrote:
@Remedios wrote:
@Anonymalous wrote:It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
There isn't a single lender that doesn't show all transactions for primary cardholder.
Some, like Amex, will not show transactions to AUs that were made by primary cardholder.
Does that mean some banks will let the AU see the primary cardholder charges? Or the AU only sees the overall utilization on the card to be aware when the limit is nearing?
Is AMEX allowing the primary cardholder to allocate a portion of the limit for the AU to see and utilize?
Chase, it's a single login, yours. If you want your AU to see charges, either you show it to them or you give them login.
Disco, US Bank, Cap One are same as Chase, basically at your discretion.
None of them allow setting different spend limit for AU, nor do they allow separate login. I think Citi is same, but don't quote me on that one.
Amex lets AU set up separate log in, they only see their charges. You can set spending limit for AUs and they can make payments using their login. They do not see charges primary account holder made.
Citi allows you to give separate access to authorized users. I've added DW's cards I'm AU on to my personal Citi login. I don't have all Citi cards, but the only one that issues a different card number for AUs is Costco, and you can set a spending limit for them. All others share the same exact card info, so you can't really separate purchases. You can also see all purchases made under the account from the AU login.
Cap One issues different card numbers to AUs, so you can see who made the charges. You can also set their "access level," so you can make them simple AUs or account managers. The latter allows them to have a login and have full access, but not entirely sure how much access is full access. I don't see an option to limit AU's spending, though.
Basically, the only cards where it's simple to separate charges are the ones that assign individual card numbers and not share the same with everyone.
This is much easier to accomplish with business cards or Amex.
With Capital One, you can definitely limit the AU's spending. My husband has full access to my limit. My kids have limited access, one has a $500 limit, the other has a $2000 limit. I'm not sure why most banks don't give a different card number for AUs. I love that Capital One does.
@Remedios wrote:
@NRB525 wrote:
@Remedios wrote:
@Anonymalous wrote:It's worth remembering that authorized users are not responsible for the charges on the card. If you give someone an AU card, then you're responsible for paying it off, not them. So even if your financial institution allows your AU to login and see the charges from their account, that's just a bonus. You're the primary, and it should always be visible (and payable) from your account.
There isn't a single lender that doesn't show all transactions for primary cardholder.
Some, like Amex, will not show transactions to AUs that were made by primary cardholder.
Does that mean some banks will let the AU see the primary cardholder charges? Or the AU only sees the overall utilization on the card to be aware when the limit is nearing?
Is AMEX allowing the primary cardholder to allocate a portion of the limit for the AU to see and utilize?
Chase, it's a single login, yours. If you want your AU to see charges, either you show it to them or you give them login.
Disco, US Bank, Cap One are same as Chase, basically at your discretion.
None of them allow setting different spend limit for AU, nor do they allow separate login. I think Citi is same, but don't quote me on that one.
Amex lets AU set up separate log in, they only see their charges. You can set spending limit for AUs and they can make payments using their login. They do not see charges primary account holder made.
Wow, this is eye opening in a rather frightful way. DW has her own Chase log in, so I guess we will explore whether she sees the AU card once issued. I'm not at all concerned about the charges in this case, since we are married, but I'm scratching my head how anyone would want a non-family member, someone who is only a friend, to be AU.