No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Signature Cards and I hope that the following will help you better understand the purpose of this card.
Signature Cards provides what is called preferred access to entertainment, sporting and dining events along with concierge service. They will also provide hotel upgrades and special offers from retailers.
With that said, there appears to be many different opinions as to how the Credit Issuer reports these cards to the credit bureau.
Your credit access line will show on your credit card statement as a revolving line. There is no pre-set spending limit and “each charge” is evaluated based on spending and payment patterns and your relationship with the issuer including any and all information from your credit report that may show your relationship with other creditors.
Any time that you exceed your credit access line the issuer reports (in house) the excess as non-revolving line. In other words, you must pay the entire amount of your non-revolving line along with any minimum payment due on your next billing statement. The credit issuer will no longer report to the credit bureau when an account balance becomes greater then the access line. (Formerly know as credit limit)
The credit issuer will report these types of accounts as Flexible Spending Revolving Accounts along with the high balance. They NO NOT report the credit access line or credit limit.
Thus, the problem of the consumer begins. The three Credit Bureaus do not have any type of consistent proprietary method as to how this will show on the consumer’s credit reports. Some will show the credit limit as N/A or leave blank, another will show -0- as the credit limit. This reporting method does have an adverse affect on the overall debt to credit ratio for reporting and credit scoring.
Unfortunately, the CEOs of Credit Card Issuers and Credit Reporting Agency’s have no idea what problems they have created with their current reporting procedures. There is a total lack of communications with customers. The old concept “You speak, we listen” is no longer accepted today, including management of FICO.
One method to possibly have them listen is for all those consumers that have a Signature Card to write the CEOs and voice their personal opinion of the problem. The other method would be to file a class action suit based on some harmful adverse action that was implemented against a consumer because of the incorrect reporting.
Your comments are welcome.
FaircreditguyFL
That is very interesting. All three agency’s report mine as revolving.
Would you care to share exactly how the other agencies report your card??
Anyone else care to share how their card is reported by the three Credit Bureaus???
It is my understanding that they will use your “High Balance” for scoring purposes. However, your debt to ratio took a hit since they do not report the credit limit, thus providing you with a lower score than you should have received. Utilization is a factor in scoring. Many thanks for your comments.
By the way, congratulations on your room upgrade.
@CreditDrama85 wrote:EX is actually counting it as "open" also, its just that under payment terms...it says "1 month" on the credit report to signify it is an open ended account with not set cl
As I have indicated previously, there is no consistency in the way signature cards are reported on the credit report.
My Ex Report shows TYPE: Flex Spending. TERMS: N/A. CREDIT LIMIT: N/A
Since the credit limit is not reported, utilization is calculated by dividing the current balance of the account by the High Balance.
When the credit limit is reported the utilization is based on the current balance divided by the credit limit.
Please correct me if I am in error.
To be perfectly honest, other than the perks of this card it serves no useful purpose for the average consumer. The non- reporting of the credit limit actually hurts the overall debt to credit ratio percentages.
I suppose one could enjoy this card as a status symbol rather than being practical.
Cleanmachine wrote:
As I have indicated previously, there is no consistency in the way signature cards are reported on the credit report.
My Ex Report shows TYPE: Flex Spending. TERMS: N/A. CREDIT LIMIT: N/A
Since the credit limit is not reported, utilization is calculated by dividing the current balance of the account by the High Balance.
When the credit limit is reported the utilization is based on the current balance divided by the credit limit.
Please correct me if I am in error.
To be perfectly honest, other than the perks of this card it serves no useful purpose for the average consumer. The non- reporting of the credit limit actually hurts the overall debt to credit ratio percentages.
I suppose one could enjoy this card as a status symbol rather than being practical.
cheddar
With your score, I find it hard to believe that you would have any difficulty in obtaining a signature card. Take the plunge and get that card off your wish list.
As far as the perks making it worthwhile, I believe you can obtain the same perks just by asking the Merchant using any other card.
Have any ideas or suggestions as to how the consumer can get the managers of the credit card industries, credit bureau’s, including FICO to revisit this problem as to their method of reporting and how it actually affects the consumer credit report and scores???