No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@gdale6 wrote:Yes you should care there may be a time where you have to revolve and carry balances. As your Fico and payment history improves then you should qualify for lower rates on your cards. CUs offer much lower rates than major banks even to young credit files.
Even if all your cards have a 5% APR, there should never be a time when you have to revolve and carry balances.
I've said it before, and I'll certainly be saying it again many times here: credit cards are not a replacement for savings. If you reach a point where you have to rely on credit cards and carry balances to cover expenses, your savings strategy has already failed.
Reducing APRs on cards in anticipation of such an event is addressing a symptom and not the problem.
No.
I am assuming you use it like a debit card or a charge card, and you never carry or have any plans on carrying a balance. I am also assuming you have a system set up for not missing a payment. It really only matters once you carry a balance over, whether you mean it or by accident.
@AverageJoesCredit wrote:
Yes and no. If you do pif, its irrelevant. However, theres only so much we can do with our credit cards, ie chasing cli, etc but achieving lower aprs can a) be worth it if by chance one needs to carry a balance 2) () its aestheticslly pleasing and D) can sometimes be worth it to help us gauge our credit journey. If anyone can get my A,2,and D reference, especially any of you single ladies, you just stole my heart
.
@AverageJoesCredit Lol gotcha, Buzz.
OP, this is what I would say too. If you always PIF, then the APR doesn't matter at all. But if you think you may ever have to carry a balance, you'll want the lower rate. Usually getting the lender to lower the APR is possible with good usage/behavior.
@iced wrote:
@gdale6 wrote:Yes you should care there may be a time where you have to revolve and carry balances. As your Fico and payment history improves then you should qualify for lower rates on your cards. CUs offer much lower rates than major banks even to young credit files.
Even if all your cards have a 5% APR, there should never be a time when you have to revolve and carry balances.
I've said it before, and I'll certainly be saying it again many times here: credit cards are not a replacement for savings. If you reach a point where you have to rely on credit cards and carry balances to cover expenses, your savings strategy has already failed.
Reducing APRs on cards in anticipation of such an event is addressing a symptom and not the problem.
Respectfully disagree -- there is nothing inherently wrong with using a credit card with an exceptionally-low APR as a low-interest loan, in the case of an emergency (or otherwise), if someone is willing to do so. It's functionally the same as taking out a personal loan with a low interest rate, or taking out a car loan to finance an automobile, etc.
Former cards:DMB Titanium MC @ 90-day, 0% grace period | $4k BEFCU MC @ 5.49% F | $21.9k Citi DPR @ 5.99% F | Chase Platinum MC @ Prime+1.67% |
I PIF and I have never carried a balance since opening my first credit card in 2006. I don't care about the APR one bit. If I ever were to get into a situation where I'll have to utilize my credit and not PIF, I'd app for a BT/0% card and move the balance there.















@TSlop wrote:I PIF and I have never carried a balance since opening my first credit card in 2006. I don't care about the APR one bit. If I ever were to get into a situation where I'll have to utilize my credit and not PIF, I'd app for a BT/0% card and move the balance there.
That can be a little optimistic! The sort of emergency scenario people talk about is where you have lost your job (as has any partner) and you have just got a huge debt. You might not be able to get any sort of decent 0% card (without lying anyway!)
@galahad15 wrote:
@iced wrote:
@gdale6 wrote:Yes you should care there may be a time where you have to revolve and carry balances. As your Fico and payment history improves then you should qualify for lower rates on your cards. CUs offer much lower rates than major banks even to young credit files.
Even if all your cards have a 5% APR, there should never be a time when you have to revolve and carry balances.
I've said it before, and I'll certainly be saying it again many times here: credit cards are not a replacement for savings. If you reach a point where you have to rely on credit cards and carry balances to cover expenses, your savings strategy has already failed.
Reducing APRs on cards in anticipation of such an event is addressing a symptom and not the problem.
Respectfully disagree -- there is nothing inherently wrong with using a credit card with an exceptionally-low APR as a low-interest loan, in the case of an emergency (or otherwise), if someone is willing to do so. It's functionally the same as taking out a personal loan with a low interest rate, or taking out a car loan to finance an automobile, etc.
Galahad, I think A LOT of people would & will agree with your post, as that is how they actually live. But I am the weirdo that never does personal loans nor do I finance vehicles, so I am going to agree with iced on this one.
There are so many of us that chase, brag, and give each other applauses & praises when we acquired a new card, a SUB, CLI, successful recon, etc. But would be more money (literally) would be bragging about savings total, retirement accounts total, emergency funds total, and how long it's been since you had a mortgage or car payment.
Many of us talk about being in the garden until the next card or app. How about a "garden" where we are all counting the months until we have no house/car/boat/etc payments (i.e. NO interest on anything whatsoever)? And than staying there!











@OmarR wrote:
@galahad15 wrote:Respectfully disagree -- there is nothing inherently wrong with using a credit card with an exceptionally-low APR as a low-interest loan, in the case of an emergency (or otherwise), if someone is willing to do so. It's functionally the same as taking out a personal loan with a low interest rate, or taking out a car loan to finance an automobile, etc.
Galahad, I think A LOT of people would & will agree with your post, as that is how they actually live. But I am the weirdo that never does personal loans nor do I finance vehicles, so I am going to agree with iced on this one.
Half this country has no savings and lives paycheck to paycheck. It's a well-known problem. A part of what keeps that problem going strong is that there is a very blind eye turned to those who make decisions that further that problem. We even tell them that it's out of their control or that it's what anyone would do or that it's not inherently wrong. How does that help?
How do we even start to solve our national debt and savings problem when the prevailing attitude about it is that it's absolutely fine to rely on a credit card should a sudden unplanned expense arrive? The answer starts with us stopping the nonsense that it's fine to jump into CC debt when a problem arrives and figure out how to dig out of that hole later.
If something happens and you have no choice in the matter, you have no choice in the matter, but it doesn't change the fact that the choice you were forced to make wasn't the result of a slowly building problem that went ignored. So again I state, lowering your APR because you expect you might need to carry debt on a CC is addressing a symptom, not the problem.
Anyway, I've spent enough OT time on that one. I'm moving on.