I don't believe the CA's wording was open to interpretation and here is why:
- "removing relevant information" can not be construed as removing ONLY some information in a tradeline.
-"removing relevant information" cannot be construed as amending information
-"removing relevant information" cannot be construed as leaving a tradeline void of some information but not other
the completeness of a record or tradeline is not optional and it's not up to the furnisher of information.
the mere fact of having some fields in a tradeline reported incorrectly (willingly or not) is a FCRA violation and it can be pursued in court by the consumer, the AGs or the FTC.
Having said that, i councur with the advice of always getting a clear and crisp definition from the CA about what they are committing to do.
good luck!
