No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
A bunch of things going on here.
In general, before doing disputes, you should always do a lot of research first. Then, never do telephone disputes or disputes based on credit monitoring site data.
When you dispute, you only dispute:
Now, if they are lying by phone about not receiving your letter, THAT is worthy of a BBB/CPFB letter. I wouldn't say I was offering PFD, I would say I sent certified letters by mail to discuss payment options and they are refusing to respond. That's it, nothing else. Send them a copy of the CMRRR receipts and tell them that if they don't want to discuss payment, they must immediately remove all derogatory information from your credit reports as you have contacted them multiple times in good faith at high cost of time and postage.
What you really need to do is cut your phone cord or hit your smartphone with a hammer and stop relying on it for credit building purposes. It's your second biggest enemy.
The normal CRA procedure after receiving a dispute is to send a copy, along with your supporting documentation, to the furnisher via their electronic dispute process, referred to as e-Oscar. They use e-Oscar for over 90% of their referrals to the furnisher of the disputed information.
Apparrently, they have concluded that your request for a dispute will require special dispute processing.
I would suggest sending a paper dispute to the CRA, and forgo an online dispute, as you apparently are either asserting something that needs more than a check box dispute, or requires supplemental documents.
As for your CFPB complaint, you apparently have not yet heard from the CFPB, so it is premature to speculate on their response.
However, the first step in any resolution of an assertion of inaccurate reporting should be a formal dispute, providing the furnisher the opportunity to respond and either verify or correct. I would not expect the CFPB to intervene until a dispute resolution has been provided.
If the assertion is that they are incorrectly reporting as a factoring company or the debt as an installment, those items dont go to the legitimacy of the debt per se, and thus would not be basis for deletion of their entire collection, so I dont see the basis for asserting deletion based on the ultimate determination of the accuracy of those items.
@Shadowfactor wrote:
I pulled my report from Experian. Only the report since I can’t get a new score update having gotten one 2 days ago. It’s back to showing as an installment loan.
Worse it’s now got an open date of 01/2018. It used to be opened 02/2016 So I’m assuming they re-aged my debt. No. They didn't "re-age" your debt. They updated the reporting of the debt to current. The last time they reported on it was 2016, and now they've reported on it in 2018, hence the date change. Your DOFD doesn't change.
The debt might be past the SOL, but your score is going to take a hit now because before the debt was last updated in 2016 but now it's been updated to 2018. Current collections hurt much more than collections that are over two years old. The only way to recover any points will be to let it age again, or pay it to zero or do both. It will really hurt your score if they start updating it monthly from now on.
If it's already been updating monthly, then nothing should change, score wise.