No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Hey all - it has been eons since I have posted here, after rebuilding my own credit from high 400s-mid 700s. However, my good friend Gina has recently had a charged off loan with RISE Credit (after only 60 days, which I found crazy odd), whom I am very unfamailiar with. They are offering her 50% to settle it before they sell to a CA (about $700), but will report the loan charged off whether she pays, settles or does nothing. From here, I have learned that a paid charge off is as bad score wise as unpaid CO -- so the question is: Should she even bother at this point? I told her that if they sell to a CA it could pop up on the report too, further driving score down (scores are already very low due to divorce and major COs/Delinquencies, 500ish). . But she was told by a rep that a CA may settle for even less, and right now saving her money is our main goal, not maximizing credit scores. She can get the $700 to pay the settlement offer, so should she, or should she let it ride out?
No idea who RISE usually sells to, as I havent heard much on them. Any input on options would be great !! Thank you!
If it's her only charge off, paid will be better than unpaid. If she has multiple charge offs, and all have a balance, then it probably won't make a difference then, but if this would be her only charge off, paid could make a difference in score.
Counter with a lowball offer and maybe eventually with back and forth you can settle for less than that. Then pay it off. You don’t want eventual wage garnishments. Paid is always better than unpaid.
I would take the 50% settlement, avoiding the reporting of a collection, and also any civil action.
A recent CO implies it is still within SOL?