No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
>
Yes, a debt collector has express permissible purpose under HIPAA to obtain sufficent specific account information such as is needed for them to conduct their business of attempting to collect on a medical debt.
The issue, as for any assertion of violation of HIPAA, is not whether they have medical account information, but whether it exceeds the limitation of not providing any unecessary specifics of medical condition, procedures or services.
In my opinion, they have not violated HIPAA by obtaining details of medical procedures and services that would go beyond the permissible purposes provided under HIPAA. However if you disagree, you can always consult an attorney and file a HIPAA non-complance complaint with the medical providor.
>
Expiration of SOL on bringing civil action does not negate the debt, and thus does not remove either their ability to continue collection activities, or affect the DV process. It simply means that the owner has lost the right to secure a civil judgment ordering your payment of the debt, and providing legal basis for subsequent attachment of assets or garnishment of pay as forced payment of the debt.
Some states have enacted their own enhanced debt collection practices statutes or regs that impose on a debt collector the specific obligation to inform a consumer if the SOL is known to have expired. However,that is not a requirement under the federal FDCPA, and does not impact any ongoing DV process.
>
>
The passing of the SOL means you have a defense if you are sued. They can still file suit, you just have to raise SOL as a defense. Then you can sue CA for violations
Picture this. CA has wrong DOFD. Files suit. Debtor doesn’t respond because he thinks debt is past SOL. Ends up with a default judgment.
This is is why you always respond to a subpoena
>
That I don’t know. Not my area of expertise. I’m limited to financial advise and debt collection and lawsuits. Lol