cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

tag
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

No, never at 850. Also, never a negative reason statement at 849 either.

 

As mentioned in other posts Discover gives negative reason statements on TU Classic Fico 8 even at scores in the 800s (MyFico stops at 800 for Classic Fico). I received negative reason statements thru Discover with scores at 845 and 848 but not at 849 or 850.

 

I have been at 849 for 3 months now on TU (due, I suspect, to a new inquiry eroding my buffer). However, no negative reason statement. However, I do get a negative reason statement for this (a new inquiry) on EQ thru Citi Bankcard Fico 8.

EQ BC Fico 8 graph 1-2018.jpg

 

See below pastes from Discover. Note my EQ and Ex scores both stayed at 850 - only TU dropped. I think the drops related to high balances on DW's card where I am AU. Makes me wonder if AU card is counting on TU Fico 8 but not EQ or EX. [note the very good rating for debt amount on TU only]

3B 10-30-2016.jpg

 CK reported UT% (includes AU card).jpg

* The above utilization graph is from CK.

Too many accounts 1.jpgtoo many accounts 2.jpg

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 21 of 34
iv
Valued Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?


@Anonymouswrote:

Thanks.  I'm not there yet, though... we'll see what happens in May.

 

TT, curious with you and your 850 scores - Did you ever have a negative reason statement with an 850 score?  I figure they could still in theory exist, because due to the > 850 buffer, someone in theory could still possess an 850 score with 1 inquiry from the last year present (for example) so I would think a "too many inquiries" reason code could still be generated.  I'm just wondering if at 850 it is ommitted or not?

 

 


Most sources leave out the reason codes once within 50 points of max... but TU does include reason codes with their alert service, including as displayed on myFICO:

 

TU Reason CodesTU Reason Codes

 

Even there, the reason codes appear to be suppressed from display at 850.

 

EQ8:850 TU8:850 EX8:850
EQ9:847 TU9:847 EX9:839
EQ5:797 TU4:807 EX2:813 - 2021-06-06
Message 22 of 34
NRB525
Super Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

Yeah, Too Many Accounts With Balances is the easy way for the algorithm to fill the requirement.

 

Everything else is not happening at high scores; no new accounts, no high utilization, no lates, it’s just accounts reporting. 

 

Thus, you won’t be able to shake it at high scores. 

High Bal Jan 2009 $116k on $146k limits 80% Util.
Oct 2014 $46k on $127k 36% util EQ 722 TU 727 EX 727
April 2018 $18k on $344k 5% util EQ 806 TU 810 EX 812
Jan 2019 $7.6k on $360k EQ 832 TU 839 EX 831
March 2021 $33k on $312k EQ 796 TU 798 EX 801
May 2021 Paid all Installments and Mortgages, one new Mortgage EQ 761 TY 774 EX 777
April 2022 EQ=811 TU=807 EX=805 - TU VS 3.0 765
Message 23 of 34
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

9 revolving accounts reporting (3 with balances), 1 closed and an Alliant SS reporting at 8%.  Navy Federal EQ 9 at 799 gives me this...

 

"Key Factors Impacting Your 03/04/2018 FICO® Score
Too many accounts with balances
Length of time accounts have been established"

 

...Next month it will be down to 2 accounts reporting.  The month after that it will be 1.  Interested to see what the codes will be at that point.  Should be over 800 by then, also, so that may have an effect on the codes according to what I've read in this thread.

Message 24 of 34
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

I don't know, it sounds like outside of 849-850 that "too many accounts with balances" may be a gimme reason code.  I see that code with a current 840 score, so it doesn't seem like being over 800 here really matters. 

Message 25 of 34
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

I did a little investigation comparing old 3B reports on EQ Fico 04 bankcard where I always get reason statements. For me I saw the "too many credit cards carrying balances" reason statement 100% of the time whenever 4 of 6 or more cards report balances, 67% of the time with 3 of 6 reporting and 0% with 2 of 6 reporting.

EQ BC Fico 04 1.jpgEQ BC Fico 04 card 2.jpg

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 26 of 34
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

Thanks for providing that additional data, TT.  Percentage wise, it's safe to say that 33% is enough for avoiding the reason statement.  Did you have any open installment loans or any other accounts with balances in addition to the revolvers?

Message 27 of 34
NRB525
Super Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

It may be a little early to get so specific about percentage. Let's review all these reason codes at high scores (thanks TT for the images).

 

The Reason Codes include:

Not enough Installment History, implying no installment account is running, correct?

Account balances are too high for Revolvers or Non-Installment or Non-Mortage loans, I see those multiple times here. What sort of revolvers utilization are we talking about?

Card counts for Too Many Accounts with Balances.

Anything else I'm missing in the mini-font display?

High Bal Jan 2009 $116k on $146k limits 80% Util.
Oct 2014 $46k on $127k 36% util EQ 722 TU 727 EX 727
April 2018 $18k on $344k 5% util EQ 806 TU 810 EX 812
Jan 2019 $7.6k on $360k EQ 832 TU 839 EX 831
March 2021 $33k on $312k EQ 796 TU 798 EX 801
May 2021 Paid all Installments and Mortgages, one new Mortgage EQ 761 TY 774 EX 777
April 2022 EQ=811 TU=807 EX=805 - TU VS 3.0 765
Message 28 of 34
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?

I have one open 15 year mortgage with 13 years of payment history. So total # of accounts with balances would be one higher than the # cards listed above. Aggregate utilization (including AU card) was under 6% in all cases above. The below UTs are from MyFico 3B reports which are excluding the AU card and AMEX charge card.

3B Utilization summary.jpg

 

[Side note AMEX charge reported 100% B/HB for both the 7/2016 and 8/2016 pulls. This impacts EX Fico 98 but has no affect on Fico 04 or the later Fico 8 and Fico 9 models]

 

As mentioned in other threads EQ Fico 04 severely penalizes my score when more than 3 cards (over 50% report balances). Not so with the other CRAs.

 

See below which shows reason statements side by side with other CRAs. You can see the greater weight EQ gives to # reporting.

Cards 3B compare EQ & TU.jpgCards 3B compare EQ and EX.jpg

 

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 29 of 34
Thomas_Thumb
Senior Contributor

Re: Least no. of accts w/bal and rec neg reason code?


@NRB525wrote:

It may be a little early to get so specific about percentage. Let's review all these reason codes at high scores (thanks TT for the images).

 

The Reason Codes include:

Not enough Installment History, implying no installment account is running, correct? "You have not established a long installment credit history", (I have an open mortgage with 13 years credit history - opened 9/2005. However, mortgages are treated differently and I suspect this reason statement relates to non mortgage installment loans. I don't have any other installment loans on file).

 

Account balances are too high for Revolvers or Non-Installment or Non-Mortage loans, I see those multiple times here.

1. "The amount owed on your revolving accounts is too high" (could this be an absolute dollar amount?)

2. "The balance on your non mortgage credit accounts is too high"

What sort of revolvers utilization are we talking about? (aggregate utilization under 6% in all the above cases. I believe the too high non mortgage account balances may relate to AMEX charge card B/HB).

Card counts for Too Many Accounts with Balances. "You have too many credit cards carrying balances" ( I PIF, don't "carry" balances)

Anything else I'm missing in the mini-font display? - "You have a short credit history" (on TU 2/2016 -My open account credit history dates back to my 1984 AMEX green card.) - "You have recently been looking for credit" (On EQ 3/2015 summary only - Relates to an HP CLI from 6/2014) - "You have made heavy use of your available revolving credit" (EX 7/2016, 8/2016 - AMEX at 100% B/HB)

 

FWIW - See below comments direct from MyFico when I clicked on details on a 2016 report summary. I understand AU cards are factored in Fico 8 for some profiles but not for other profiles.

 

Text box statements.jpg


 

Fico 9: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 8: .......EQ 850 TU 850 EX 850
Fico 4 .....:. EQ 809 TU 823 EX 830 EX Fico 98: 842
Fico 8 BC:. EQ 892 TU 900 EX 900
Fico 8 AU:. EQ 887 TU 897 EX 899
Fico 4 BC:. EQ 826 TU 858, EX Fico 98 BC: 870
Fico 4 AU:. EQ 831 TU 872, EX Fico 98 AU: 861
VS 3.0:...... EQ 835 TU 835 EX 835
CBIS: ........EQ LN Auto 940 EQ LN Home 870 TU Auto 902 TU Home 950
Message 30 of 34
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.