No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I've been challenged on this topic, but, IMO, paying a CA can lower your score if you pay without a PFD. One thing we all can agree on is that paying a CA will not help your score.
The mere presence of a CA reporting is the damage. Creditors don't like to see it reporting because it indicates that you had credit troubles in the past. Therefore, when you pay a CA without a PFD it won't increase. It doesn't matter if you owe $0 or $10,000, the damage is equal.
Where we differ is whether or not your score can drop. Payment will always change the reporting date and the DOLA. I'd argue that changing these dates from an older date (esp. true if the CA hasn't updated in a long while) to a newer date. FICO would see this as a newer collection vs. seeing it as an older one. My 2 cents anyway. Some have reported no change after PIF without a PFD and some have reported drops.
Sorry llecs,
I am a rookie, so could you tell me what IMO,PFD and DOLA stand for?
Thanks
Actually i am going to take a guess. DOLA (Date of Last Activity?)
PFD=Something file date?
IMO=Not sure ![]()
lrand wrote:Actually i am going to take a guess. DOLA (Date of Last Activity?)
PFD=Something file date?
IMO=Not sure
Close....DOLA is Date of Last Activity. This date can be updated with a payment, updated via a dispute, DV letter, etc.
PFD = Pay for Delete.
IMO = In My Opinion.
But how can the update of a DOLA on the consumer part negatively impact FICO? It does not, of course,update DOFD.
Is the impact of old derogs updated in FICO scoring based on a subsequent DOLA payment against the derog?
It is the account re-reporting and the date reported beiing brought forward in time that causes the problem. It is how FICO is intrepreting the re-reported./updated account that is the problem. I have "heard" that this will be corrected in the new FICO 2008 score model. I am not 100% sure if I am correct or not.