cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Question about AZEO Strategy

tag
RicHowe
Valued Contributor

Question about AZEO Strategy

Does utiluzing the AZEO strategy really result in SIGNIFICANT boost in score as opposed to a Pay Everything In Full strategy? To me it seems that leaving a small balance would take points off the table. Zero util should result in maximum 30% of score awarded.

I hear the algorithm is wonky in this way, but if we are talking a pioint or two difference. Is it worth the effort?

Educate me.
Message 1 of 21
20 REPLIES 20
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

AZEO versus PIF-to-zero affects my profile by anywhere from 8-14 points consistently.  I've tested this at many score levels (550s, 600s, 650s, 700s).

 

It's significant enough, 2-3% of overall FICO score points available.

 

AZEO does not affect FICO points for "amounts owed".  AZEO affects FICO points for "credit mix".  If you aren't using your credit cards, you lose points in "credit mix".  If you report a very small balance on one card (or on fewer than 1/3 of cards actually), you get maximum points for "amounts owed" and you can get points lost for "credit mix".

 

Amounts owed = 30% of FICO or 165 possible points.  No obvious penalty for using $0 to 8.9% of credit limit.

 

Credit mix = 10% of FICO or 55 possible points.  No obvious penalty unless you don't show usage on the credit mix.  It's no different than the SSL technique when someone has no open installment loan reporting (ding on credit mix, can be as much as 40 points out of 55!).  I almost want to say that this section is 15 points for credit card usage and 40 points for installment loan usage but I don't have enough data points to prove that.

Message 2 of 21
RicHowe
Valued Contributor

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

Okay. So if someone does have other types of credit usage, than AZEO would have little impact?
Message 3 of 21
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy


@RicHowe wrote:
Okay. So if someone does have other types of credit usage, than AZEO would have little impact?

No because "credit usage" is split up into at least two different categories, namely "usage on credit cards" and "usage on installment loans".  So having a balance on an installment loan helps with a small part of "credit usage" but doesn't affect it for all of it.

 

My napkin math calculations lately tell me that installment loans seem to be about 20% of "credit usage" and credit cards seem to be about 80% of "credit usage" -- out of 165 points, I guesstimate that credit card usage is somewhere around 130 total points and installment usage seems to be around 35 total points or so.  This is separate from "credit mix" which is how nice of a mix of credit you have (open credit cards 5+, open installment loans 1+, with at least one account in each tier showing some activity right now).

Message 4 of 21
RicHowe
Valued Contributor

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

Ahh now it makes sense. Brilliant!
Message 5 of 21
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

I should also mention two things

 

  1. This data is my best guess but I've written a credit score analyzer and I input a lot of shared data form folks I know who send me their 3Bs to massage into my analyzer -- and I know my analyzer is WRONG because I keep finding outliers.
  2. There is also something called a "scorecard" or "bucket" which FICO puts people in.  There are 10-12 of these depending on which flavor of FICO score you're looking at.  The most common scorecard involves the age of your oldest account of any kind, so having old accounts reporting gives you the maximum number of FICO points within each category.  Having any derogatory data may put you into a negative scorecard (there are 2 or 4 I believe) which means you may not get 100% of points within any category even if you're perfect there.

So your mileage, as always, may vary, but so far my "FICO predicator" has been working exceptionally well for me and a few others who I'm friends with in real life.

 

Just remember that AZEO is not actually about "credit usage" per se, it's about showing activity on a part of "credit mix", a category which appears to prefer installment loans versus "credit usage" which appears to prefer credit cards...  Confusing, yes, but the analyses seems to agree with this statement.

Message 6 of 21
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy


@Anonymous wrote:
 

AZEO does not affect FICO points for "amounts owed".  AZEO affects FICO points for "credit mix".  If you aren't using your credit cards, you lose points in "credit mix".  If you report a very small balance on one card (or on fewer than 1/3 of cards actually), you get maximum points for "amounts owed" and you can get points lost for "credit mix".

 


Hey ABCD!  Hope you are having a good weekend.

 

AZEO (as a strategy) affects number of accounts showing a positive balance.

 

FICO has always described how many accounts have positive balances as part of its Amounts Owed category:

     * Payment History (35%)

     * Amounts Owed (30%)

     * Length of Credit History (15%)

     * Credit Mix (10%)

     * New Credit (10%)

 

Here is a link to the breakdown of the various factors included in the Amounts Owed category:

https://www.myfico.com/credit-education/amounts-owed/

 

You'll see that "How many accounts have balances" is one of the listed factors.

 

That said, I don't see "which category" as being a terribly important question.  What's important is that it is part of every FICO scoring model, with more or less emphasis placed on it depending on the model.  Contributor Thomas Thumb has shown (if I remember right) that the older models (e.g. FICO 04 and FICO 98, used now for mortgage lending) place a greater emphasis on this than does FICO 8.

 

So I think you are basically right -- which is to answer the OP that AZEO is a useful strategy that does affect one's score.

 

I'll add one closing thought to our OP... and that is that the scoring benefit one gets from AZEO can be obtained in full by implementing in the 40 days before an important credit application.  Our OP is asking a practical question about whether it is "worth the effort" and he contrasts it with just letting cards report and then paying in full.  From a practical perspective, he can certainly use his PIF strategy and then pull out AZEO only as part of a pre-app strategy.  If he only applies a couple times a year, that's very little effort.

Message 7 of 21
RicHowe
Valued Contributor

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

Thanks for the replies.

 

To be clear, I PIF before the statement closes so that zero balance shows to the CRAs. Would I get the AZEO benefit if I paid off all revolvers as I do now, and maybe left a small balance on my charge card (not paying by statement close but PIF immediately after statement close)? I hear charge cards don't factor into Util anymore/as much. So I could get the benefit of 0% Util AND have a balance from my charge card statement to gain the benefit of usage for the credit mix points?

 

I only have the AMEX Delta Platinum and the AMEX Platinum cards? My scores are in the 700's.

Message 8 of 21
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

PS.  Final note to our OP.  Rereading your initial post, it's possible that your current strategy may actually not be PIF (which means to allow cards to report their balances to the bureaus, but then pay the amount on the statement in full).

 

Rather, you may be adopting a PTZ approach (pay to zero) where you have all cards reporting zero at all times (because you pay each one to zero before the statement).  I am wondering if that is perhaps what you do, since you describe your approach as involving "zero utilization" and conjecture that leaving a small balance on one card would involve a small penalty.

 

If so, then there is no question that you are being penalized by FICO.  No FICO model likes it when you have all cards at zero.  The penalty varies but many folks experience it as 15-20 points.  Allowing one card to report a balance would eliminate this penalty.

 

AZEO vs. PIF, in contrast, is a question about whether a person can just allow his cards to report balances naturally without making sure that they are all zero except one every month.  Many people just allow their cards to report and then PIF, pulling out AZEO in the rare cases when they are applying for credit.

Message 9 of 21
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Question about AZEO Strategy

Just saw your last post.  Yup, looks like I was right.  You are currently using a PTZ approach, rather than PIF.  And you are being penalized by FICO for doing that.

 

To avoid the "all cards at zero" penalty, you need at least one card to report a positive balance.  That card should not be a charge card, since they are often excluded from FICO's calculations.  The one card should be:

 

(1)  A true credit card (not a charge card)

(2)  A card in your name (not an AU card)

(3)  A card showing a balance of at least $5 (tiny balances like $1-3 can sometimes be reported as $0)

(4)  A card with a credit limit of < 34.9k (cards with obscenly huge credit limits are dropped from FICO's calculations in some models -- but less than 34.9k is safe)

 

Message 10 of 21
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.