cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Simulator Error?

tag
RobertEG
Legendary Contributor

Re: Simulator Error?

All I would add, Andy, is that the explanations given for plus or minus factors that accompany your scores are usually wrong, and often totally contradictory.  They are driven off of specific flags that do not take into account all factors.  Most simply ignore any reasons given that attempt to explain changes or plus/minus factors.  I find them useless.
Message 11 of 15
fused
Moderator Emeritus

Re: Simulator Error?



RobertEG wrote:
All I would add, Andy, is that the explanations given for plus or minus factors that accompany your scores are usually wrong, and often totally contradictory.  They are driven off of specific flags that do not take into account all factors.  Most simply ignore any reasons given that attempt to explain changes or plus/minus factors.  I find them useless.


Do you think he will reach the 700 club? Reducing reporting revolving util from 95% to 9.20% is huge. I have seen much smaller decreases in revolving util land people 40-60 point increases.
Message 12 of 15
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Simulator Error?

I had a 80 point difference between 43% and 5%.
 
I can see him in the 700 club easy.

fused wrote:


RobertEG wrote:
All I would add, Andy, is that the explanations given for plus or minus factors that accompany your scores are usually wrong, and often totally contradictory.  They are driven off of specific flags that do not take into account all factors.  Most simply ignore any reasons given that attempt to explain changes or plus/minus factors.  I find them useless.


Do you think he will reach the 700 club? Reducing reporting revolving util from 95% to 9.20% is huge. I have seen much smaller decreases in revolving util land people 40-60 point increases.



Message 13 of 15
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Simulator Error?

Don't quote me on this, but, I think you'll get some points at least on the accounts that would report a $0 balance; least that I got from my own score simulator (credit keeper). I'm almost certain

fico takes into consideration the number of accts. reporting a balance, but I could be wrong.

Anyone else care to validate this assumption? 

Message 14 of 15
marty56
Super Contributor

Re: Simulator Error?

Just got my EQ score and I was told the best action would be is:

 

Best Action - Pay Down 90%-100% of Your Credit Card Balances - Over the Next 24 Months

 

Only problem is that my CC balance is $88 which is 1% (rounded up) so I could never do that.

 

They correct comment would have been to keep paying bills on time over the next 24 months.

 

Almost seems the best action comments are random or they are copying FAKO comments.  As I said before, the simulator is uselss.

1/25/2021: FICO 850 EQ 848 TU 847 EX
Message 15 of 15
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.